Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM05578
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/10/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A0.0; SHEET INDEX: SHEET S4.0 INDICATES PARTIAL ROOF FRAMING PLAN. REVISE. 2. SHEET A0.0; SHEET INDEX: SHEET S5.0 INDICATES FOUNDATION DETAILS. REVISE. 3. SHEET AD.1; DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: NOTE 16 INDICATES TO TURN DOWN THE FOOTING IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING AS NOTED. PROVIDE A REFERENCE DETAIL IN NOTE 16 FOR THE FOOTING TURN DOWN. 4. SHEET A0.1; SECTION 05: THE FOOTING THICKNESS AND DEPTH BELOW GRADE DO NOT MATCH THE STRUCTURAL DETAIL 107/S4.0. REVISE TO MATCH (SEE COMMENT 27). 5. SHEET A0.1; DETAIL 01: NOTE 4 INDICATES THERE ARE TEN PIPE BOLLARDS, WHILE ONLY 8 ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. CLARIFY. 6. SHEET A0.1; DETAIL 01: NOTE 4 REFERENCES DETAIL 18/A0.2. REVISE. 7. SHEET A0.1; DETAIL 02: NOTE 1 INDICATES METAL COMPONENTS TO BE PAINTED PER THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET A2.0. REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE. 8. SHEET A0.1; SECTION 05: THE VERTICAL WALL REINFORCING INDICATED DOES NOT MATCH THE STRUCTURAL DETAIL 107/S4.0. REVISE TO MATCH (SEE COMMENT 27). 9. SHEET A0.1; DETAIL 12: PROVIDE A DIMENSION ON THIS DETAIL FOR THE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF THE SIGN. 10. SHEET A0.1; DETAIL 15: IN KEYNOTE 7, PROVIDE THE DOWEL LENGTH AND MINIMUM EMBEDMENT INTO EACH SIDE OF THE CONCRETE SLAB, OR REFERENCE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL. 11. SHEET A1.0; PLAN KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 15 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 12. SHEET A1.1; DETAIL 19: REFERENCE STRUCTURAL DETAILS ON S5.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 13. SHEET A1.1; PLAN 02: KEYNOTE 8 INDICATES A PREFABRICATED CANOPY. PROVIDE THE MANUFACTURER'S DESIGN AND ERECTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REVIEW. 14. SHEET A1.1; PLAN 03: VERIFY THE SECTION CUT 3/A3.0 IS CORRECT WHERE IT IS CUT ON THE PLAN. 15. SHEET A4.0; DETAILS 4 AND 8: PROVIDE THE DOWEL LENGTH AND MINIMUM EMBEDMENT INTO EACH SIDE OF THE CONCRETE SLAB, OR REFERENCE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL. 16. GENERAL: PROVIDE A FULL SIZE SITE PLAN. 17. SHEET S1.0; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: INCLUDE NOTES FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA. 18. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 4 REFERENCES DETAIL 103 FOR THE CMU INFILL. REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 19. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 6 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 20. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 6 REFERENCES DETAIL 105 FOR THE CMU INFILL. REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 21. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: AT GRIDS K AND 5, THERE IS A DETAIL 110 INDICATED NEXT TO A SECTION 110. IS THE DETAIL REFERENCE CORRECT? VERIFY. 22. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE COLUMN IDENTIFIED BY KEYNOTE 16 WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY. 23. SHEET S3.0; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 4 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLANS. VERIFY. 24. SHEET S3.0 (PARTIAL MAIN ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.2 (DETAILS 221 AND 223): CALL OUT THE TUBE STEEL BEAM (INDICATED ON THESE DETAILS) ON THE PLAN. 25. SHEET S3.0 (FRAMING PLANS); SHEET S5.2 (DETAIL 221): THIS DETAIL IS NOT CUT ON THE PLANS AND WAS NOT FOUND ON ANY PLAN NOTE. PROVIDE. 26. SHEET S3.0; INTERMEDIATE TOWER FRAMING PLAN: IS THE DETAIL CUT REFERENCE 235 AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THIS PLAN CORRECT? VERIFY. 27. SHEET S4.0 (DETAIL 107); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 29): THE CMU WALL REINFORCING AND FOOTING SIZE SHOWN ON DETAIL 107 DO NOT MATCH THE CALCULATIONS. CLARIFY. 28. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 108: PROVIDE A DIMENSION ON THE DETAIL TO LOCATE THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING FROM THE FINISH GRADE. 29. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 106: PROVIDE A DIMENSION ON THE DETAIL TO LOCATE THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING FROM THE FINISH GRADE. 30. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 101: PROVIDE A NOTE OR REFERENCE FOR THE EPOXY DOWELS FOR THE CMU WALL. 31. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 104: PROVIDE A NOTE OR REFERENCE FOR THE EPOXY DOWELS INTO THE STEM WALL OR SLAB. 32. SHEET S5.0; SECTION 201: A NOTE AT A WIDE FLANGE BEAM (AT ELEVATION +18'-6") REFERENCES DETAIL 202 FOR A BEAM TO BEAM CONNECTION. REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 33. SHEET S5.2 (DETAIL 235); SHEET S3.0 (PARTIAL MAIN ROOF FRAMING PLAN): THE DETAIL INDICATES THE WING WALL IS DIRECTLY OVER THE EXISTING JOIST, WHICH IS NOT THE CASE FOR THE EAST WING WALL INDICATED ON THE PLAN. CLARIFY WHETHER THE WALL MUST FALL DIRECTLY OVER THE JOIST, AND PROVIDE A DETAIL WHERE IT DOES NOT FALL DIRECTLY OVER THE JOIST. 34. SHEET S5.2; DETAIL 235: VERIFY THE LEFT PORTION OF THIS DETAIL IS CORRECT. WHERE IS THIS STEEL TUBE BEAM LOCATED ON THE PLAN? 35. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 1: THE SOIL DATA INDICATES AN ASSUMED ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE OF 1500 PSF, OR AN ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE OF 2500 PSF TO 3000 PSF PER THE SOILS INVESTIGATION. REMOVE ONE OF THESE DESIGN CRITERIA FROM THE CALCULATIONS (AND PROVIDE THE SOILS REPORT FOR REVIEW). 36. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/12/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | FACADE ONLY, NO WW NEEDED PER PCWW |
| 09/12/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/13/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/13/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Keynote 8 on sheet AD-1 indicates the removal of an existing roof drain. Provide plans and calculations to show how the roof drainage will be modified to protect the roof from collapse. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006. |
| 09/13/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/13/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/17/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed |