Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM05158
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/05/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/09/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1: ANGEL CHARITY REUNION HOUSE - DP12-0137 2: 1" WATER METER - NEED WATER SUPPLIER INFORMATION FOR CREDIT 3: NEED CAPACITY EVALUATION -KURT STEMM 740-6607 NEED DP REVIEW, NEED MANHOLE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT |
| 11/09/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/20/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed by the architect. [Original comment: Provide a detail to show that the construction of the shower receptors comply with the requirements of Section 417.5.2, IPC 2006.] |
| 11/20/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The energy code compliance calculations were not included in this submittal. The architectural drawings and the specifications do not show the U-factors and SHGF-values for the skylights and the tempered glass. [Original comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.] 2. Comment not resolved; a 10"-diameter duct with a flow rate of 800 CFM has a mean velocity of 1466 FPM. [Original comment: Revise the size of the grease duct for the Type I hood to provide a minimum velocity of 1500 feet per minute. Reference: Section 506.3.4, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 3. The architectural interior elevations show plywood cabinets touching the sides of the hood and the wall behind the hood is constructed with wood studs and has only a stainless steel backsplash. The shop drawings for the hood do not indicate zero-clearance construction. [Original comment: Show that the hood installation complies with Section 507.9, IMC 2006 for clearances (e.g. 18" clearance to combustibles such as cabinets, and with a smooth, cleanable, non-absorbent, and non-combustible material installed between the hood and the wall, and extending 18" beyond the hood).] 4. Comment not resolved; show that the units supplying make up air for the kitchen hood are electrically interlocked to the exhaust fan. [Original comment: Provide adequate make up air for the kitchen exhaust hood. Show that the unit supplying make up air for the kitchen hood is electrically interlocked to the exhaust fan. Reference: Section 508.1, IMC 2006.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/26/2012 | CPIERCE1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/26/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/26/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |