Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T12CM04926
Parcel: 117023950

Address:
927 N PERRY AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: PLANS OK TO SUBMIT - RES

Permit Number - T12CM04926
Review Name: PLANS OK TO SUBMIT - RES
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/09/2012 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied P&DS TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician

PROJECT:
T12CM04926
927 North Perry Avenue
Addition to SFR


TRANSMITTAL: August 9, 2012


COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO).


A DDO is required for additions to the SFR along the south and west property lines. A DDO is also required for the front setback. This site is in the R-2 Zone (LUC Section 2.3.5.2.A.1). The Development Designator is "I" (LUC Section 3.2.3.1.B) and the Perimeter Yard Indicator AA (LUC Section 3.2.6.4).

The minimum setback to the south and west property lines is the greater of six (6) feet or two-thirds (2/3) the height of each of the structure's wall facing the south and west property lines (LUC Sections 3.2.3.1.B & 3.2.6.4). The highest point of the addition is ten (10) feet, six (6) inches to the south. The setback requirement along the south property line is seven (7) feet. That proposed setback is six (6) feet. The height of the wall facing the west property line is sixteen (16) feet, seven (7) inches. The required setback is eleven (11) feet. The proposed setback is nine (9) feet, eight (8) inches.

The front setback requirement is twenty (20) feet to the property line (LUC Section 3.2.6.5.A). The proposed setback is ten (10) feet, two (2) inches.
08/09/2012 MICHAEL ST. PAUL NPPO REVIEW Passed
08/09/2012 ELEIBOL1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved Calc done to ck FP; out of COT FH FP - WSEL calc'd to be 69.2. Zoning awaiting DDO approval.
12/05/2012 CAGUILA1 BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Needs Review