Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM04572
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/27/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Sheet T.0 indicates type V-B non-sprinklered, yet deferred submittal notes indicate sprinklers. Resolve. Occupant load calculations (Sheet T.0) indicate 2 different numbers. Resolve. |
| 07/31/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | GENERAL 1. Provide structural details and calculations for: a. Exhaust Hood b. Al roof top mounted HVAC equipment. c. The South Patio addition 2. Please provide a roof plan showing all demolished mechanical equipment and all new mechanical equipment. SHEETS T.0, SP2 AND A7.2 3. The City of Tucson adopted the 2006 IBC as the governing building code for all privately constructed building projects on July 10, 2007. The accessibility requirements are enumerated in Chapter 11 which also incorporates the ICC A117.1, 2003 Edition. A 2010 ADASAD accessibile building review may be obtained for this project by filing an appeal with the building official, Mr. Ron Boose. The following comments are made for document adjustments if an appeal is not filed: a. Delete all 2010 ADA references on these sheets b. Reference the COT adopted code as stated above c. Insure that all accessibility requirements designed in this project meet the requirements of said goverening accessibility code. SHEETS T.0 AND LS.0 4. The code data shows this building to be type VB Non-sprinklered. The deferred submittals include a sprinkler system. The 2006 IBC, Section 903.2.1.2 (2) require sprinklers for 100 or more occupants. Please provide a sprinkled system for this building. SHEET T.O 5. Total Occupancy Load adds to 148. Occupancy loads shown on LS.0 show 141. Please reconcile. SHEET A7.2 6. At details 2 and 3, delete the requirements for door mounted signage. It is not required. END OF REVIEW. |
| 08/08/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning has reviewed the building plans to ensure compliance with the Development package Site Plan. While the building plans are in substantial compliance with the DP site plan, zoning cannot approve the building at this time. Site issues have to be addressed on the DP site plan as well as a potential DSMR request may be pending. Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal and compare to the approved and stamped DP site plan to ensure compliance. Zoning will approve and stamp the building plans for the Zoning review purview if in compliance with the approved and stamped DP site plan. |
| 08/10/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/10/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM04572 4821 E Grant Rd Smashburger 1. Provide location of the Main Service in the Electrical Sheets. 2. Sheet E4.0, must provide an existing load value on the 800 Amp SES in order to verify load added on by this tennant improvement. Figure existing load per 2005 NEC 220.87. 3. Sheet E4.0, fault current level at beginning of 800 Amp service is 44,309 Amps, how is the FC level dropped to 22,155 amps at beginning of Panel A and 23,484 amps at Panel B ? Also the panel discriptions indicate a 10K/42K rating, does this mean a 10K/45K rating is established through this panel ? Ray T Majuta Elec Pln Ck PDSD, City of Tucson 8/13/2012 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (upper and lower case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 2. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top units. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 3. Show how adequate access is being provided for the equipment located on the roof. Reference: Section 306.5, IMC 2006. 4. Show the pipe sizes for the condensate drains depicted on sheet P1.0. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. 5. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006. 6. Revise the ventilation calculations shown on sheet M1.0 per Section 403.3, IMC 2006. Occupancy figures other than those shown in Table 403.3 (e.g. 100 people per 1000 square feet in a fast food facility, etc.) may be used only upon appeal to the building official with the submission of statistical data that substantiates the proposed occupancy numbers. 7. Correct the air balance schedule to reflect the actual exhaust flow rate of EF-2. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 403.3.4, IMC 2006. 8. Revise the size of the grease ducts to provide a minimum velocity of 1500 feet per minute. Reference: Section 506.3.4, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 9. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. |
| 08/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the plumbing code to be used for this activity. The plumbing calculations on sheet P4.0 refer to the 2006 UPC but the Governing Code analysis on sheet T0 refers to the 2006 IPC. This review has been made using the 2006 UPC. 2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (upper and lower case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 3. Verify that the use of ABS piping for the direct vent flue system is allowed per the manufacturer's listing information. Coordinate the materials shown in the detail on sheet M2.0 with the fixture schedule on sheet P4.0. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 510.8.3, and 512.0, UPC 2006. 4. Appliances (e.g. soda dispensers, ice makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006. 5. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks and urinals require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 6. Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006. 7. Clarify the size of the cleanout and building drain located in the men's restroom. Reference: Sections 316.4.1 and 707.11, UPC 2006. 8. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 08/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/23/2012 | CPIERCE1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 08/23/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SMASHBURGER 2. NEED WASTEWATER IWC REVIEW OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR- RUSTY 724-6200 3. NEED TO CLARIFY WATER METER SIZE & LOCATION (UPSIZING FORM) FOR SEWER CONNECTION FEE CALCULATION |