Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM04248
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/23/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Be advised that top of storage cannot exceed 12'-0" above finished floor. Higher storage will require fire sprinklers. |
| 10/28/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T12CM04248 Total Transit (Previously Discount Cab) Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 28, 2013 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans and while the plans are in substantial compliance with the development package site plan as it relates to zoning's review purview, zoning cannot approve them at this time. (The development package has not been approved as of this building review.) 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the revisions to the development package site plan. |
| 11/01/2013 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/06/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Can not approve the building plan until the DP Package is approved. Due to floodplain restrictions the FFE must be elevated to a regulatory flood elevation. |
| 11/15/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The revised detail (now 1/M3.1) shows the evaporative coolers mounted on an angle iron frame with four legs; nothing on the detail indicates that these four point loads will be distributed over to the strengthened purlins. Show how the concentrated loads will be safely accommodated. [Initial comment: Revise detail 2/MP1 to eliminate elements that do not apply to the installation of the evaporative coolers on a standing seam metal roof. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 302.1, IMC 2006.] |
| 11/15/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The response to the initial comment stated that the size of the wet-vented section of pipe between the urinal and the water closet was shown on the plumbing fixture schedule: it was not shown there. Section 908.2, UPC 2006 requires that the wet-vented section shall be a minimum of one pipe size larger than the required minimum waste pipe size of the upper fixture. The minimum drain size for a urinal is 2" which means that the wet-vented section must be at least 2-1/2" in size. Reference: footnote 2, Table 7-3, UPC 2006. [Initial comment: See sheet two detail one. Reference: 908.0 2006 UPC. Vertical wet venting. Show the drain size between the urinal and the water closet on the wet vented section.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/25/2013 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/25/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |