Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM04136
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/07/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/08/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Blue Bell Creameries - 9398 E. Old Vail Road T12CM04136 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 8, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 11/16/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not resolved; "other" construction assemblies used with COMcheck require supporting documentation to verify the overall U-factor for the assembly. Insulation installed on a suspended ceiling with removable ceiling tiles may not be included when determining the thermal resistance of the roof assembly. Reference: Section 502.2, IECC 2006. [Original comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.] |
| 11/21/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the differences between the overall plumbing floor plan and the waste and vent isometric. The isometric calls out floor drains in locations where the plumbing plan indicates hub drains. Hub drains do not comply with Sections 411.1 and 804.1, UPC 2006. (Note: this is only applicable to the sanitary drain system.) 2. The floor drain located in the tool & supply room (121) requires a cleanout. [Original comment: Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks and urinals require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006.] 3. Provide a vent for each fixture trap (e.g. the floor drains). Reference: Sections 901.0 and 905.3, UPC 2006. |
| 12/04/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/05/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Project status will be changed to approved when the dev.pkg. is approved. |