Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM03961
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET T1.1; CODE ANALYSIS: THE ANALYSIS LISTS THE BUILDING USE AS RETAIL, LISTS THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS M, THEN CALCULATES THE OCCUPANT LOAD BASED ON A BUSINESS (100 SF/PERSON). THIS IS A SHELL BUILDING, SO NO OCCUPANT LOAD IS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME, BUT THE ISSUE WILL NEED TO BE CLARIFIED. 2. SHEET T1.1; DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. 3. SHEET T1.1; SHEET INDEX: THE INDEX INDICATES SHEETS A3.1 AND A4.1, WHICH ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SET. VERIFY. 4. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 5 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A1.1; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 5 REFERENCES SHEET A4.1. VERIFY (SHEET NOT IN SET). 6. SHEET A1.1; WEST ELEVATION 3: NOTE 6 (MASONRY VENEER) POINTS TO THE DOOR. REVISE. 7. SHEET A1.1; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 14 REFERENCES SHEET A4.1. VERIFY (SHEET NOT IN SET). 8. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: THE SECTIONS ALL INDICATE SHEET A3.1. VERIFY (SHEET NOT IN SET). 9. SHEET A2.1; REFLECTED CEILING PLAN KEYNOTES: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE IN NOTE 4. 10. SHEET A2.1; ROOF PLAN: A DETAIL ON THE EAST WALL INDICATES 4/A3.1. VERIFY (SHEET NOT IN SET). 11. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATION): NOTE 2 INDICATES A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 12. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S4.0 (DETAILS): A NOTE ON THE NORTH WALL INDICATES THE TOP OF FOOTING IS 98'-0". PER THE DETAILS ON SHEET S4.0, NEW FOOTINGS INDICATE THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING AS 1'-6" MINIMUM BELOW FINISH GRADE. SHOULD THERE BE A NOTE ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN INDICATING A STEP IN THE FOOTING AT THESE LOCATIONS? VERIFY. 13. SHEET S3.0 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 5): LINTEL DLT2 IS A GLU-LAM BEAM, BUT THE PLAN AND SCHEDULE INDICATE A STEEL STUD WALL LINTEL. CLARIFY. 14. SHEET S4.0; DETAILS 405 AND 406: THESE DETAILS ARE CUT IN THE SAME LOCATION, BUT INDICATE DIFFERENT CONDITIONS. VERIFY AND MOVE DETAIL AS REQUIRED. 15. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 402: IS IT IMPORTANT THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE NEW FOOTING MATCH THE EXISTING FOOTING? ADD A NOTE ON THE DETAIL AND PLAN. 16. SHEET S5.0; DETAILS 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, AND 506: REFERENCE THE TOP OF THE WALL TO THE ARCHITECTURAL. 17. SHEET S5.0; DETAIL 507: REFERENCE THE ELEVATION OF THE STEEL TUBE TO THE ARCHITECTURAL. 18. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 07/24/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/24/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/24/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/26/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/30/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHELL RETAIL SPACE - ADDITION TO EXISTING BUILDING 2. CONNECTION TO EXISTING ON SITE PRIVATE HCS PER UTILITY PLAN 3. NEED TO SHCNGE ADDRESS FROM 4391 N ORACLE RD PER 1ST FLOOR ADDRESSING/MICHELENE 07/30/12 4. NEED TO CLARIFY WATER METER INFORMATION ON DRAWING WITH WATER SUPPLIER VERIFICATION - DRAWING P1.1 SHOWS CONNECTING TO EXISTING 2" WATER LINE WITH A 1" SUB-METER AND DRASWING CU-1 SHOWS CONNECTION TO 1/2" WATER METER AT ORACLE RD - NEED FOR SEWER FEE CALCUTION |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/07/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |