Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T12CM03784
Parcel: 117160110

Address:
19 E TOOLE AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T12CM03784
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/27/2012 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
07/03/2012 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET SP1.0; SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 4 INDICATES A NEW METAL "ACCESSIBLE" EXIT STAIRS PER ICC SECTION 1023. THE STAIR IS NOT "ACCESSIBLE", AND SECTION 1023 OCCURS IN THE IBC. REVISE.
2. SHEET SP1.0; CODE ANALYSIS: VERIFY THE NUMBER OF PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRED.
3. SHEET SP1.0; CODE ANALYSIS: A NOTE INDICATES ONE UNISEX RESTROOM IS IN SPACE #19, AND ONE UNISEX RESTROOM IS BEING ADDED IN SPACE #17. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS PER THE IBC TABLE 2902.1 OR THE PLUMBING FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
4. SHEET SP1.0; CODE ANALYSIS: TABLE 2902.1 OF THE 2006 IBC REQUIRES A SERVICE SINK. PROVIDE.
5. SHEET SP1.0; SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: NOT ALL OF THE KEYNOTES ON THE PLAN ARE LISTED. VERIFY.
6. SHEET SP1.0; VARIANCE REQUESTS: SUBMIT THESE REQUESTS IN WRITING TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV.
7. SHEET SP1.0; CODE ANALYSIS: TABLE 2902.1 OF THE 2006 IBC REQUIRES A HIGH/LOW DRINKING FOUNTAIN OR A SINGLE POINT-OF-USE WATER DISPENSER. PROVIDE.
8. SHEET A1.0; GROUND FLOOR PLAN: PER THE 2006 IBC SECTION 1017.1, THE CORRIDOR SHOWN IN SPACE #19 MUST BE FIRE RESISTANCE RATED. VERIFY.
9. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: A NOTE IN SPACE #17 INDICATES "FUTURE" UNISEX RESTROOM. REVISE THE NOTE.
10. SHEET A1.0; PLAN KEYNOTES: THE NOTE UNDER THE TITLE INDICATES REMODEL PLANS 2, 3, AND 7/A1. CLARIFY.
11. SHEET A1.0; ACCESSIBILITY NOTES: THE NOTE UNDER THE TITLE INDICATES REMODEL PLANS 2 AND 3/A1 AND 2/A2. CLARIFY.
12. SHEET A1.0; PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 2 REQUESTS AN EXEMPTION. SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV.
13. SHEET A1.0; PLAN KEYNOTES: IN NOTE 4, MAKE A REFERENCE TO THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, SECTION 604.7.
14. SHEET A1.0; PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 5 REFERENCES 6/A1 AND ELEVATIONS 4 AND 5/A1. CLARIFY.
15. SHEET A1.0; PLAN KEYNOTES AND ACCESSIBILITY NOTES: NOTES NEED TO REFERENCE THE ICC/ANSI OR THE IBC.
16. SHEET A1.0; DOOR SCHEDULES: SCHEDULES ARE LISTED FOR 15 AND 17 E. TOOLE. REVISE.
17. SHEET A1.1; PLAN KEYNOTES: CLEAR UP THE NOTES AND REVISE THE NOTE NUMBERS.
18. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: ADD A NOTE FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE ELEVATOR IN 17 E. TOOLE.
19. SHEET A1.1; DEMO PLAN KEYNOTES: NOT ALL OF THE LISTED KEYNOTES ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN. ADD THOSE NOTES.
20. SHEET A2.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A1.0 (DOOR SCHEDULE): THE PLAN INDICATES A DOOR 105 INTO GALLERY f, BUT THE SCHEDULE HAS NO 105. COORDINATE.
21. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 1014, DOORS CAN NOT LOCK TO PROHIBIT ACCESS TO THE STAIRS FOR GALLERY g AND f. VERIFY.
22. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: DO THE STAIRS MEET THE IBC SECTION 1015.2.1 FOR SEPARATION? VERIFY.
23. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 1014, STUDIO l CAN NOT EXIT THROUGH STUDIO j FOR EXIT ACCESS IF THE DOORS CAN LOCK. VERIFY.
24. SHEET A2.0; PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 4 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE FLOOR PLAN. VERIFY.
25. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN: ADD A NOTE FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE ELEVATOR IN 17 E. TOOLE.
26. SHEET A3.0; STAIRS: DO THE STAIRS MEET THE IBC SECTION 1007.3 FOR CLEAR WIDTH? VERIFY.
27. SHEET A3.0; STAIRS: PER THE IBC SECTION 1020.1, THE EXIT STAIRWAYS (VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURES) SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. VERIFY.
28. SHEET A3.0; SECTION 4: THE VERTICAL DIMENSION CALL-OUTS ARE CUT OFF. REVISE.
29. SHEET A3.0: THIS SHEET IS INCOMPLETE. NONE OF THE KEYNOTES (PLAN OR SECTION/ELEVATION) LISTED ON THE SHEET ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR SECTIONS/ELEVATIONS. VERIFY.
30. SHEETS A3.0/A3.1; GENERAL STAIR NOTES: STAIR TREAD AND RISER DIMENSIONS MUST BE INDICATED ON THE PLANS PER THE IBC SECTION 1009. PLACE ON ALL STAIR PLANS.
31. SHEET A3.0: A SECTION OR ELEVATION 6 IS INDICATED, BUT NO DRAWING WAS PROVIDED. VERIFY.
32. SHEETS A3.0/A3.1; STAIR PLAN KEYNOTES AND SECTION/ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTES 3 AND 4 REFERENCE DETAIL 7/A3. REVISE (NO DETAIL 7/A3).
33. SHEET A3.1; DETAIL 7: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE IN THE DETAIL.
34. SHEET A3.1; STAIR PLANS 1 AND 2: THE PLANS INDICATE ELEVATION 6/A3, BUT NO ELEVATION 6/A3 IS PROVIDED. VERIFY.
35. SHEET A3.1; STAIR PLANS 1 AND 2: THE LANDINGS DO NOT APPEAR TO MEET IBC SECTION 1009.4 REQUIREMENTS. VERIFY.
36. SHEET A3.1; STAIR PLANS 1 AND 2: THE STAIR SECTION CUTS INDICATE SHEET A3. REVISE.
37. GENERAL: PROVIDE A PLAN INDICATING EXIT EGRESS AND THE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS USING EACH EXIT. INCLUDE THIS FOR THE GROUND FLOOR AND THE BASEMENT.
38. GENERAL: PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS FOR GRAB BARS AND PAPER DISPENSERS PER THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 CHAPTER 6.
39. GENERAL: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE INFILL OF THE EXISTING ELEVATOR, STAIR DESIGN, AND STAIR SUPPORT FRAMING.
40. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
07/09/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Show the location and size of the reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly and the size of the water meter. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required at the water meter for multi-use commercial buildings. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
07/09/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide plumbing plans for the new work (e.g. relocation of lavatory, relocation of the water heater, and installation of the "future" restroom if it will be part of this activity) including water isometrics and waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1 and Section 2902.2, IBC 2006. See also, Section 1109.5.1, IBC 2006. (Note: hose bibbs cannot be substituted for a service sink.)
07/09/2012 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
07/09/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
07/12/2012 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied 1. 2006 IFC Section 1013. Please provide a Guard for the rear dock used for exiting.
2. Please provide a detail for the outside stair.
3. Please indicate how the interior stair is protected per 2006 IFC 1009.5.3
4. On sheet A2.0 please indicate how the wall that will be installed to close the opening will be secured. 2006 IFC 703.1
5. Please indicate compliance with 2006 IFC section 1006 Illumination and Section 1011 Exit signs.
07/18/2012 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied NO ELECTRICAL PLANS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED FOR LIGHTING OR POWER. CONSIDERING THIS SPACE HAS BEEN GUTTED AND IS NOW BEING REMODELED FOR ARTIST STUDIOS IT SEEMS UNLIKELY THAT NO ELECTRICAL WORK HAS BEEN DONE NOR WILL NEED TO BE DONE, PARTICULARLY FOR EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHTING.
07/23/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied INFO
1. TOOLE ATISAN CENTER - BASEMENT & 1ST FLOOR - RECOUNTED ALL WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNITS - INCLUDES 17 E TOOLE AV & 19 E TOOLE AVE WITH 1 - TOILET & 1 - LAV IN EACH ADDRESS
2. NO PREVIOUS WASTEWATER CONNECTION FEE PERMIT

COMMENTS
3. NEED TO SHOW LOCATION & SIZE OF WATER METER ON PLANS
4. NEED WATER METER RECEIPT SHOWING THE WATER METER NUMBER & SIZE FROM WATER PROVIDER (TUCSON WATER) SHOWING AL ADDRESSES THAT THE METER SERVES
5. NEED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION OF USER FEES PAID FOR CREDIT EVALUATION IF APPLICALBE (WATER BILL, ETC).
07/25/2012 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Steven Eye DATE: July 25, 2012
31 E. Toole Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701

Subject: Toole Artisan Studio, 19 E. Toole Ave.
Site Plan, T12CM03784 (First Review)
Floodplain Use Permit, T12OT00960 (First Review)
T14S, R13E, Section 12

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site plan and Floodplain Use Permit

The Site Plan (SP) and Floodplain Use Permit (FUP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. Provide documentation from the S.P.R.R. allowing the proposed stairs to be built in the S.P.R.R. right-of-way prior to the re-submittal.
3. See redlines for additional comments. If you have any questions or comments do not hesitate to either email or call me for clarifications.

Floodplain Use Permit:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the FUP.
2. Per Chap. 26 of the Tucson City Code, the project was reviewed as "Substantial Improvement".
3. Per Chap. 26, The proposed improvements cannot exceed 50% of the cost of the structure not including the land:
Provide the following in the re-submittal:
" The cost estimate for the all the proposed work to the structure, not limited to the stairs, including materials and labor. See attached sample cost estimate.
" The assessed value of the structure. If a professional appraisal is not available, then the 2012 tax assessor's value will suffice. If the assessors value does not distinguish between the improvements and the land value, then 65% of the amount will be used as the value of the structure.

4. If you have any questions or comments do not hesitate to either email or call me for clarifications.



If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/ 19 E. Toole Ave. Site plan - FUP