City of Tucson

Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T12CM03729

Parcel: 13015001A

Address:

4646 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T12CM03729

Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI

Review Status: Completed

Search:

Review Date	Reviewer's Name	Type of Review	Description	Status	Comments
07/17/2012	ERIC NEWCOMB	BUILDING-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	1. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 11 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE DRAWINGS. VERIFY. 2. SHEET A4.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 3 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A7.1; DETAIL 2: SHOULD THE DOWEL INTO THE EXISTING FOOTING BE EPOXIED? VERIFY. 4. SHEET A7.2; PLAN 1: THE SERVICE DESK HEIGHT SHALL MEET THE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1109.12.3 AND THE ICC/ANSI CHAPTER 9. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A7.2; PLAN 2: THE SERVICE DESK HEIGHT SHALL MEET THE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1109.12.3 AND THE ICC/ANSI CHAPTER 9. VERIFY. 6. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: SINCE THE STEEL COLUMNS ARE NOTED ON THIS PLAN, EITHER HAVE THE COLUMN SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET, OR REFERENCE SHEET S3.1 FOR THAT SCHEDULE. 7. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 4 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 8. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER, THERE IS A PLAN NOTE 5 INDICATED, BUT THERE IS NO 5 IN THE PLAN NOTES. VERIFY. 9. SHEET S3.1; FRAMING PLAN: WHY IS THE DETAIL 111 NOT NOTED AS A 200 DETAIL? ALL DETAILS FOR THE ROOF FRAMING ARE 200 SERIES. VERIFY. 10. SHEET S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.1 (DETAILS 201 AND 202): CLARIFY ON THE PLAN OR ON THE DETAILS WHICH DETAIL REFERENCES THE EAST SIDE, AND WHICH REFERENCES THE WEST SIDE. 11. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 101: CHANGE NOTE 2 ON THE KEYED JOINT DETAIL. 12. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 107: NOTE 6 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE DETAIL. VERIFY. 13. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 111: THE NOTES DO NOT MATCH THE CALL-OUTS ON THE DETAIL. COORDINATE. 14. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 206: CHECK THE VERBIAGE IN NOTES 2 AND 3. 15. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 211: NOTE 2 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE DETAIL. VERIFY. 16. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 211: CHECK THE VERBIAGE IN NOTES 3 AND 4. 17. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 212: CHECK THE VERBIAGE IN ALL OF THE NOTES. 18. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. 19. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
07/19/2012	BETH GRANT	COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE	COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING	Approved
07/25/2012	ROBERT SHERRY	PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Approved
07/25/2012	ROBERT SHERRY	WATER	REVIEW	Approved
07/26/2012	ROBERT SHERRY	MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Denied	1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4, 101.4.3, and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Clarify the mechanical energy compliance certificate; the title information indicates that the building is located in Denton, Texas.
07/30/2012	GERRY KOZIOL	WWM	REVIEW	Passed

Showing 1 to 6 of 6 entries