Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM03729
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/17/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 11 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE DRAWINGS. VERIFY. 2. SHEET A4.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 3 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE ELEVATIONS. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A7.1; DETAIL 2: SHOULD THE DOWEL INTO THE EXISTING FOOTING BE EPOXIED? VERIFY. 4. SHEET A7.2; PLAN 1: THE SERVICE DESK HEIGHT SHALL MEET THE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1109.12.3 AND THE ICC/ANSI CHAPTER 9. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A7.2; PLAN 2: THE SERVICE DESK HEIGHT SHALL MEET THE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1109.12.3 AND THE ICC/ANSI CHAPTER 9. VERIFY. 6. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: SINCE THE STEEL COLUMNS ARE NOTED ON THIS PLAN, EITHER HAVE THE COLUMN SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET, OR REFERENCE SHEET S3.1 FOR THAT SCHEDULE. 7. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 4 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 8. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER, THERE IS A PLAN NOTE 5 INDICATED, BUT THERE IS NO 5 IN THE PLAN NOTES. VERIFY. 9. SHEET S3.1; FRAMING PLAN: WHY IS THE DETAIL 111 NOT NOTED AS A 200 DETAIL? ALL DETAILS FOR THE ROOF FRAMING ARE 200 SERIES. VERIFY. 10. SHEET S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.1 (DETAILS 201 AND 202): CLARIFY ON THE PLAN OR ON THE DETAILS WHICH DETAIL REFERENCES THE EAST SIDE, AND WHICH REFERENCES THE WEST SIDE. 11. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 101: CHANGE NOTE 2 ON THE KEYED JOINT DETAIL. 12. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 107: NOTE 6 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE DETAIL. VERIFY. 13. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 111: THE NOTES DO NOT MATCH THE CALL-OUTS ON THE DETAIL. COORDINATE. 14. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 206: CHECK THE VERBIAGE IN NOTES 2 AND 3. 15. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 211: NOTE 2 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE DETAIL. VERIFY. 16. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 211: CHECK THE VERBIAGE IN NOTES 3 AND 4. 17. SHEET S5.1; DETAIL 212: CHECK THE VERBIAGE IN ALL OF THE NOTES. 18. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. 19. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 07/19/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 07/25/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/25/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4, 101.4.3, and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Clarify the mechanical energy compliance certificate; the title information indicates that the building is located in Denton, Texas. |
| 07/30/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed |