Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM03718
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/13/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: QT #1476 - 8530 E. Broadway Blvd. T12CM03721, T12CM03718 & T12BU00792 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 13, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 08/21/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide the canopy, FOR THE "C" STORE CANOPIES NOT THE GASOLINE CANOPY, total square footage for pricing and fee purposes. 2. OK 3. OK 4. The special inspector's Certification needs the actual name of the inspector that is to conduct the inspection, not the name of the company. Please revise form accordingly and resubmit. REVISED FORM NOT INCLUDED IN RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE 5. Please provide a letter to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose, stating that the steel trusses are to be deferred for a later review. PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER HEAD STATIONARY LISTING YOUR INTENDED DEFERRED SUBMITTALS TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR HIS APPROVAL. 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ALL COMMENTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 08/27/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Whether the civil engineer or the plumbing engineer shows the installation of the backwater valve in inconsequential but the installation of a backwater valve will require the plumbing engineer to provide a vent from downstream of the backwater valve to comply with the requirements of Section 904.1, UPC. [Original comment: The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2655.18') is higher than the first floor elevation (2653.50'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 2. Comment not resolved. The size of the vent for the gravity grease interceptor was not an issue; see the previous comment. [Original comment: Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2006. Vents located upstream from pumps, ejectors, backwater valves, or other devices that obstruct the free flow of gases between the building sewer and the outside atmosphere shall not be used for meeting the required cross-sectional vent area.] 3. Elastomeric trap guards (Pro-vent, et al) are not approved for use in the City of Tucson. [Original comment: Provide protection of the trap seals for all floor drains subject to infrequent use. Reference: Sections 1007.0 and 1007.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 4. Comment not resolved; the drawing appears unchanged, with crickets appearing to direct the rainwater flow to the "light fixtures". [Original comment: Coordinate the layout of the roof drains and overflow roof drains serving the main roof with the architectural roof plan on sheet A130. (Note that what appears to be scuppers and overflow scuppers along the south wall of the building on sheet P104 are identified as light fixtures on the architectural plans.) Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1101.11.1, UPC 2006.] 5. Comment not resolved. Nothing associated with the roof drain leaders from the low canopies leads to detail A5-P512; the notes instead lead to detail L8-P510, which is "not used".[Original comment: Provide a cleanout at the base of each roof drain leader from the low canopies prior to their connection with the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Section 1101.12.2, UPC 2006.] 6. Comment not addressed. [Original comment: Revise the orientation of the storm drain cleanouts located at the northeast, northwest, southwest, and southeast corners of the building (e.g. see sheet C120) so that they open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Sections719.4 and 1101.12.1, UPC 2006.] |
| 08/31/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/05/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1: QUICK TRIP #1476 2: CONNECTING TO EXISTING ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER PER APPROVED DP PER PCRWRD/TOM PORTER/ 7/19/12 3: NEED WASTEWATER IWC REVIEW & APPROVAL OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR TOM TOMCHAK 724-6200 -3035 W EL CAMINO DEL CERRO 4: CONNECTION TO NEW 2" WATER METER - NEEDS TO SUBMIT INFORMATION FOR UPSIZING OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING WATER METERS FOR CREDIT IF APPLICABLE. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/18/2012 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/18/2012 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |