Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM03655
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/28/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The drawings and calculations for the Maintenance Building and the Guard Shack are approved. 2. For the other Amenities please provide the following: a. A full set of structural and framing drawings and details including connection details and structural sections. b. A complete set of structural calculations for each Amenity element. c. In the calculations please provide a key plan referencing each structural design element i.e. foundation and framing. d. There are no calculations for the Portal Arbor. 3. Please identify each set of structural calculations. There is included in the resubmittal package a two page, FDN DESIGN, hand written calculation that is not referenced as to what it is. It may be part of T12CM03657. 4. Please submit a for a separate permit for all signage. Signage is not approved with this submittal. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The envelope energy calculations still do not correspond to the building shown on the plans. See sheets A101, A300, and A801 for the dimensions of the building. [Second comment: Comment not resolved; the calculations do not appear to match the building under consideration. The gross area of the building is 80 square feet, the gross area of the walls appears to be greater than 288 square feet, the projection factor for the windows and glass doors is not 0.20 for all cases, and there are three doors for the building.] [Original comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the gate house envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient additional detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall include, as a minimum, construction of the fenestration components. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.] 2. Comment cannot be resolved unless the owner provides information regarding the intended use of the "chemical storeroom". [Second Comment: Comment not resolved. The reply indicates that no pool chemicals are to be stored in the maintenance building but what will be stored in the "chemical storage" room? The room will be provided with high- and low-level ventilation grilles for some purpose.] [Original comment: Provide the types and quantities of chemicals that will be stored, used, or dispensed in the three rooms of the maintenance building. Reference: Table 307.1(1), IBC 2006.] |
| 10/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The civil drawing indicates the reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly is located at the street, adjacent to the water meter. Clarify the purpose of the 2" reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly (with the additional water meter) located in the maintenance building; is it intended to be the backflow device to protect the municipal water system or a second backflow device? Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. If you wish to locate the reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly in a location other than adjacent to the water meter, provide a letter from Tucson Water (contact: Mark Titus, 520- 837-2248) agreeing to your proposed location. Reference: Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code, (http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf). [Second comment: Comment not resolved; provide the revised civil drawing that shows the new size and termination for the water service to the maintenance building.] [Original comment: Coordinate the size of the water service and the location of the water service entrance to the maintenance building with the civil drawings. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.] 2. The plumbing floor plan for the maintenance building shows two floor drains; floor drains are defined as plumbing fixtures (see Section 202, IPC 2006). The condensate hub drain detail (what is the source of the condensate?) does not appear in the plumbing plan for the maintenance building, and the code sections referenced in the condensate hub drain detail are from the 2006 UPC and are not applicable. In addition, no plumbing drawings are indicated in the drawing index on sheet G001; coordinate the plumbing design with the architect. [Second comment: Comment not resolved; provide the new sheet, P001. [Original comment: Provide fixture descriptions (i.e. material standards) for all plumbing fixtures in the maintenance building. Reference: Section 402, IPC 2006.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/18/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/18/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |