Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM03655
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/23/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | AMENITIY PLANS SHEET 07 1. Please provide arbor structural claculations and a typical construction section through one of the masonry columns. 2. Please provide structural calculations for the fence column foundations. SHEET 09 3. Please provide construction sections and details showing all construction framing and foundations for the mailbox kiosk. a. Provide structural calculations. SHEET 10 4. Ditto comment 3 for the Sign wall. SHEET 12 5. Please provide structural calculations for the cabana structural framing and foundation. SHEET G001 6. Ditto comment 3 for the dumpster enclosure, balcony, stairs and shelter. SHEET 15 7. Ditto comment 3 for all column/wall structures and steel gates. SHEET 16 8. Please provide foundation plans, details and claculations for all 20' and higher light poles. GENERAL FOR ALL PLANS 9. Please provide a completed 2 part certification form filled out with all the special inspectors to be used on this project for special inspections as outlined in your presented Statement of Special Inspections. The certification form can be found on the PDSD web site under the forms and application menu. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/04/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved; the calculations do not appear to match the building under consideration. The gross area of the building is 80 square feet, the gross area of the walls appears to be greater than 288 square feet, the projection factor for the windows and glass doors is not 0.20 for all cases, and there are three doors for the building. [Original comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the gate house envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient additional detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall include, as a minimum, construction of the fenestration components. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.] 2. Comment not resolved. The reply indicates that no pool chemicals are to be stored in the maintenance building but what will be stored in the "chemical storage" room? The room will be provided with high- and low-level ventilation grilles for some purpose. [Original comment: Provide the types and quantities of chemicals that will be stored, used, or dispensed in the three rooms of the maintenance building. Reference: Table 307.1(1), IBC 2006.] |
| 09/04/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved; provide the revised civil drawing that shows the new size and termination for the water service to the maintenance building. [Original comment: Coordinate the size of the water service and the location of the water service entrance to the maintenance building with the civil drawings. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.] 2. Comment not resolved; provide the new sheet, P001. [Original comment: Provide fixture descriptions (i.e. material standards) for all plumbing fixtures in the maintenance building. Reference: Section 402, IPC 2006.] 3. Comment not resolved; provide the revised civil drawing that shows the size and route of the drain to the culvert. [Original comment: Provide a design for the sump pit in the maintenance building. Reference: Sections 402.2 and 423.2, IPC 2006.] 4. Comment not resolved; provide the revised civil drawing that shows the building sewer design, from the building to the connection with the private sewer collection system. [Original comment: Provide a design for the building sewer for the maintenance building; the civil drawings show no connection to the private sewer collection system. Reference: 701.2, IPC 2006.] 5. Comment no resolved; no notes on the drawing address the trap primers. [Original comment: The plumbing drawing for the maintenance building calls for trap primers for the two floor drains; specify the trap primers and clarify how these are to work. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 1002.4, IPC 2006.] |
| 09/13/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM03655 1002 E 22nd ST 1. Still have not provided a compliance calculation with City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code, this is different than a ComCheck Report. The City of Tucson has it's own Outdoor Lighting Code which can be found on the City's web site. If futher information is needed call me at 520/837/4899. Ray T Majuta Electrical Plan Ck PDSD, City of Tucson 9/13/12 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |