Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM03601
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/26/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET A3 1. Delete and revove all irrelevant details and elevations from this sheet. 2. At detail 13: a. Add the "Van Accessible" sign. b. Change the 4'-3" dimension to 7'-0". 3. At detail 6: Replicate detail 13 to the face of the building. SHEET S1 4. Provide special inspector's certification for review and approval as outlined in General Structural Notes, Section 16. 5. At the Foundation Plan: a. Both detail references 103 and 104 to masonry walls are not hown on the architectuural and site plans. Please reconcile. b. Notes 4 and 6 are crossed out but are referenced and needed on the foundation plan. Please clearify. c. Note 1 has been crossed out but associated footinga nd columns are still in play at the foundation plan. Please reconcile. 6. At the Roof Framing Plan: a. If crossed outs detail 201 and 203 are not relative to this condition, what detail is relative to this condition and where do details 201 and 203 apply? 7. There appears to be changes in this project that have not been coordinated properly between the architectural, site and structural drawings. Please reconcile all changes and errors, delete the irrelevant details and designs from the sheet and resubmit. SHEET S2 8. Reference all relative details from sheet S1. 9. Delete and remove all irrelevant details. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS 10. Ditto Comment 5. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/26/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/26/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 06/28/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 2. Keynote 37 on sheet A2 calls for a new downspout and wall opening (scupper?); what are the dimensions of the new wall opening and what is the area of the roof that drains to the new opening? Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1107, IPC 2006. |
| 06/28/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 2. Provide structural details to show how the fan coil unit is to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 3. Provide a sealed drawing showing how the proposed paint booth is to be installed and provide balancing information. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. |
| 07/12/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM03601 3420 N Dodge Bl TI Auto Body 1. The information provided with the spraybooth indicates only listings (UL) are for components. The spray booth is required to be listed a whole unit. 2. How does this tennant improvement comply with NEC 2005 511 for Commercial Garages,Repair and Storage. Will automibles be brought into the building, how is the building wired to comply. 3.Indicate the Hazardous Areas as per NEC 2005.516 concerning the spraybooth. 4.Provide a fault current analysis for the new service on through to the panels, and indicate how the fault levels will be brought down to safe levels (types of fusing,series rated systems etc). 2005 NEC 110.9,110.22 5.Provide a total load calculation for the service. 6.The 3 sets of 400mcm AL equaling 1200mcm require a 2/0 grounding electrode conductor, per 250.66 ? 7. Circuits L-5 and 7 feed EC's in the panel, the power plan shows 7 and 9. 8. Concerning the tap to the new service for Panel A (once it is ready for switching), normally a tap inside an existing enclosure is allowed for older equipment which either does not have the capacity or due to age, parts cannot be found to add on to. In this case with the service being new and it being known that an extra service for Panel A will be required, the service sould provide to allow for this rather than a tap to a new enclosure, unless listed and approved for this type of installation. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, C of Tucson 7/12/2012 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/13/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed |