Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM03136
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/04/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | FACADE OVER 4 FOOT OVERHANG. FIRE SPRINKLERS MAY BE REQUIRED PER NFPA 13 |
| 06/08/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A1; PIER SECTION 5: THE PIER SECTION 2 (ON SHEET A1) INDICATES #3 TIES AT 12" OC, WHILE SECTION 5 INDICATES #4 TIES AT 16" OC. COORDINATE. 2. SHEET A3; FRAMING PLAN: BETWEEN THE GRIDS 06 AND 07 AND GRIDS D AND E, THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A 4X14 (IN THE EAST/WEST DIRECTION) IN ADDITION TO THE NORTH/SOUTH 4X14. CLARIFY. 3. SHEET A3 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S2 (DETAIL 16): THE JOISTS BETWEEN GRIDS 07 AND 07.5 ARE INDICATED AS HSS6X3X.125 ON THE PLAN BUT AS HSS3X8X.125 ON THE SECTION. COORDINATE. 4. SHEET A3 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S2 (DETAIL 15): THE JOISTS BETWEEN GRIDS 07 AND 07.5 ARE INDICATED AS HSS6X3X.125 ON THE PLAN BUT AS HSS8X3X.125 ON THE SECTION. COORDINATE. 5. SHEET A4; FACADE FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE ON GRID 10 INDICATES "NEW SHEAR WALL SEE DETAIL". INDICATE A SPECIFIC DETAIL REFERENCE. 6. SHEET S1; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: PROVIDE NOTES FOR SAWN LUMBER, STRUCTURAL STEEL SHAPES (PLATES AND ANGLES), HEAVY TIMBERS, AND GLU-LAMINATED LUMBER. 7. GENERAL: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. VERIFY THIS REQUIREMENT IS MET ON SHEETS CS, A2, A3, A4, AND A5. 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/13/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T12CM03136 TI Shell Remodel and New Facade Building plans TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 13, 2012 DUE DATE: June 28, 2012 COMMENTS:. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them on this remove. A development package is in for review and as of this building plan review the development package has not been approved. Include a copy of the approved development package with the next submittal of the building plans. Zoning will review the building plans and compare them to the approved DP for compliance. 2. It appears that there is additional square footage proposed to be added this building. While I cannot verify that without an approved development plan, I will assume that there is sufficient parking on the overall site to compensate for the additional building area. 3. Signage proposals are not reviewed by zoning but all structures attached to the building that will include signage will have to meet zoning height restrictions and setbacks where applicable. Sign permits will be reviewed and approved under separate permit. 4. Be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming on the next building plan review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
| 06/18/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/18/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the location and sizing information for gutters and downspouts. Clearly show which areas are being drained to the proposed gutter. Include the effect of vertical walls and contributory areas on the sizing. Reference: Sections 1106 and 1107, IPC 2006. 2. Provide calculations to show how the roof drains and horizontal rainwater pipes were sized. Include the effect of vertical walls on the roof areas. Reference: Sections 1106 and 1107, IPC 2006. 3. Show the slope of the horizontal rainwater pipes on the plans. Reference: Sections 1106, IPC 2006. 4. Clarify which portions of the roof are being drained by the existing 4" roof drains (keynote 4/A5) as compared to the new gutter. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 5. Clarify how the portions of the awnings located between columns D and J are being drained; the arrangement of the crickets and the roof drains does not appear to be coordinated. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 6. Clarify keynote 7/A5. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 7. Provide independent, secondary roof drains; the discharge point of the secondary roof drains shall be separate from the primary roof drains per Section 1107.2, IPC 2006 (see detail 1/A5). 8. Provide strainers for all roof drains and secondary roof drains (see detail 1/A5). Reference: Section 1105.1, IPC 2006. |
| 06/18/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/27/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/27/2012 | FRODRIG2 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |