Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM02857
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/24/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/01/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A4.0; ELEVATION KEY NOTES: NOTES 1, 2, 3, AND 4 WERE NOT FOUND ON THE ELEVATIONS. PROVIDE. 2. SHEET A5.0; DOOR SCHEDULE: THE HARDWARE REFERENCE CALL-OUTS WERE NOT FOUND IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS. VERIFY. ARE THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2006 IBC SECTION 1008.1.9 (PANIC HARDWARE) MET? 3. SHEET A5.0; DOOR TYPES: THE HEAD DETAIL AT THE ROLL-UP DOOR INDICATES 8/A5.0, BUT THAT DETAIL INDICATES IT IS 'NOT USED'. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET A6.0; DETAIL 6: REVISE THE TITLE (ALTHOUGH THIS ONE'S NOT BAD). 5. SHEET A6.0; DETAIL 9: REFERENCE STRUCTURAL SHEET S501 FOR THE CROSS BRACING CONNECTION TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. 6. SHEET S001; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATION): A NOTE INDICATES A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WAS USED FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 7. SHEET S001; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (SNOW LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA): THE GROUND SNOW LOAD FOR THE CITY OF TUCSON IS 0 PSF. REVISE THE NOTE. 8. SHEET S021 (BOND BEAM LINTEL SCHEDULE); SHEET S062 (LINTEL SCHEDULE): REMOVE THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET S021. IT DOES NOT MATCH THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET S062. 9. SHEET S032; DETAIL AT ELECTRICAL/MECHANICAL HANGER: SHOULD A SUPPORT WEIGHT MAXIMUM FOR THIS DETAIL BE INDICATED? VERIFY. 10. SHEET S032; ACCESS LADDER ATTACHMENT: REFERENCE SHEET A6.0 FOR THE ACCESS LADDER DETAIL. 11. SHEET S401; SECTION 103: THE FOUNDATION PLAN INDICATES THIS FOOTING (WF 2.0) IS 2'-0" WIDE WITH 3-#5 CONTINUOUS, WHILE THE SECTION INDICATES A 1'-0" WIDE FOOTING WITH 2 BARS (NO SIZE PROVIDED). CLARIFY. 12. SHEET S501; DETAIL 201: A SECTION CUT ON THIS DETAIL INDICATES 212/S501. PROVIDE THAT DETAIL. 13. SHEET S601; SECTION 303: NOTE 11 IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE. 14. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a cleanout at the base of the roof drain stack, prior to connection to the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Sections 708.3.4 and 1101.8, IPC 2006. 2. Revise the roof drainage calculations to include the effect of surrounding vertical walls. Revise the size of the horizontal storm drainage piping as required. Reference: Table 1106.3 and Section 1106.4, IPC 2006. |
| 06/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Note #3 for the Packaged AC Unit Schedule calls for duct smoke detectors to be installed per Section 606.2.1, IMC 2006 but in the supply duct. Per Section 606.2.1, smoke detectors are to be located in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections. The IMC does not require smoke detectors to be installed if the air handling units are not capable of distributing smoke-laden air beyond the enclosing walls of a single room or space where the smoke has been generated. Clarify your intent. Reference: Section 606.1, IMC 2006. |
| 06/08/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | From: David Rivera Zoning Review Section Date: June 8, 2012 Project: T12CM02857 Building expansion for LA Fitness. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot verify that they are in compliance with the development plan. The development plan is still under review and is out for corrections at this time. Zoning will review the plans on the next submittal and compare to the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 06/11/2012 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/11/2012, The building plans shall be approved after the Development Package is approved. |
| 06/18/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM02857 Addition to Fitness Center 1. Sheet E3.1, circuits 40 and 42 blank,lighting plan shows circuits being used for fans, input loads in schedule. Ray T Majuta Electrical Plan Review PDSD, C of Tuc 6/18/2012 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/23/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | NO NEW WASTEWATER PLUMBING FIXTURES ADDED |