Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T12CM02811
Parcel: 115044910

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T12CM02811
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/27/2012 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Approved
06/27/2012 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
07/03/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not resolved; no structural details found. [Original comment: Provide structural details to show how the fan coil units are to be supported from the building structure (i.e. how are the supports for the fan coil connected to the post-tensioned slab). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.]
2. Revise the font size used on the outside air calculation on drawing M1.0 to a minimum height of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. [Original comment: Show how the occupied accessory spaces (e.g. elevator lobby, service room, etc.) in the sublevel are maintained at a positive pressure with regard to the parking garage. Reference: Sections 403.3 and 404.3, IMC 2006.]
3. Correct the note on detail 3/M5.2 referring to detail 1/M6.1; it should be referring to detail 2/M5.2. [Original comment: Clarify the drawings noted for details or continuations. Some of the drawings called out do not exist (e.g. "M5.0-") or lead to inappropriate details (e.g. a note on detail 3/M5.2 leads to detail 1/M6.1)]
4. Correct the addition of the air flow rates for exhaust fan EF-5 riser A1. [Original comment: Clarify the air balance data for EF-3; is the total air flow 1500 CFM, 1575 CFM, or 1625 CFM? What is the total air flow for: EF-5: 2925 CFM, 3000 CFM, or 3125 CFM? EF-7: 4525 CFM or 4700 CFM? EF-9: 1500 CFM or 1625 CFM?]
07/05/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Appeal currently under review by the building official. [Original comment: Provide individual metering for the water supply to all new dwelling units. The metering may be private or utility installed. Reference: Section 301.4.1, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
2. Provide protection of the trap seals for all floor drains subject to infrequent use. Sure Seal Trap Sealers are not approved for use in the City of Tucson. Reference: Sections 706.2 and 1002.4, IPC 2006. [Original comment: Provide fixture descriptions and material standards for all plumbing fixtures. Reference: Sections 303.4 and 402, IPC 2006.]
3. Lavatory faucets shall be listed as complying with ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2006. [Original comment: Show that tempered water for the lavatories is being provided using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2006.]
4. Provide keynote 13 on sheet P1.2; it occurs at columns B-4 and B-6.
07/18/2012 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Please provide more detail for fire pump line side tap as requested (note#1) last review.Tap detail submitted does not have sufficiant information. This information will be necessary for the inspector.
2. The distribution panels need to be included on panel schedules, complete with all information, as requested (note 2c).
3. Residential load calc's ok. Please provide load calc's for commertial loads at services, total building, and distribution equipment.
4. Please verify overcurrent device ratiing for feed to primary of 30kva transformer 'TSB1', seems to be high.
5. A SELECTIVE COORDINATION ANALISIS will be requested for emergency generator, elevators, emergency equipment per 620, 700, 701 nec.
Dan Santa Cruz
Electrical plans examiner. 7-18-12
07/30/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1. NEED PCRWRD REVIEW OF LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - CHAD AMATEAU 740-6547
2. NEED 3-MANHOLE TAP CONSTRUCTION PERMITS - WASTEWATER 1ST FLOOR DENICE ELLIE 740-6369