Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM02811
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/23/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | STRUCTURAL REVIEW BY ERIC NEWCOMB 1. SHEET S001; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (STRUCTURAL STEEL): A NOTE INDICATES "ALL BOLTS SHALL BE ASTM A307, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE". ARE THE A307 BOLTS AT STEEL-TO-CONCRETE CONNECTIONS, AND A325 AT STEEL-TO-STEEL CONNECTIONS? CLARIFY ON THE DRAWINGS. 2. SHEET S100; LEVEL P1 PLAN: DETAIL 120 ON GRID LINE A BETWEEN GRIDS 4 AND 5 SHOULD BE MOVED. IT IS CUT AT A 48" DEEP CRANE FOOTING. VERIFY. 3. SHEET S101; LOW SLAB PLAN A: IS THIS SLAB DESIGN IN THE CALCULATIONS? VERIFY. 4. SHEET S101; ISOLATED FOOTING SCHEDULE: REMOVE THIS SCHEDULE FROM THIS SHEET. 5. SHEET S101: THE TOP OF THE SHEET IS CUT OFF AT THE PLAN NOTES. REPLACE SHEET. 6. SHEET S101; LEVEL 1 PLAN: DETAIL 123 CUT AT GRID LINE 3 AND WEST OF GRID LINE A WAS NOT SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEETS. PROVIDE. 7. SHEET S101; LEVEL 1 PLAN: DETAIL 253 CUT AT GRID A BETWEEN GRIDS 8 AND 9 WAS NOT SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEETS. PROVIDE. 8. SHEET S102; STEEL COLUMN SCHEDULE: WHERE ARE THESE COLUMNS REFERENCED ON THE PLANS? VERIFY. 9. SHEET S102; LEVEL 2 PLAN: DETAILS 254, 256, AND 258 CUT AT GRID B AND GRID 9 WERE NOT SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEETS. PROVIDE. 10. SHEET S102 (LEVEL 2 PLAN); SHEET S403 (DETAIL 242): DETAIL 242 CUT AT GRID C AND GRID 7 DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CUT IN THE RIGHT LOCATION. VERIFY. 11. SHEET S103 (LEVEL 3 PLAN); SHEET S403 (DETAIL 242): DETAIL 242 CUT AT GRID C AND GRID 7 DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CUT IN THE RIGHT LOCATION. VERIFY. 12. SHEET S103; LEVEL 3 PLAN: DETAIL 225 CUT AT GRID D AND GRID 7 IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE. 13. SHEET S104; LEVELS 4 THROUGH 13 PLAN: DETAIL 225 CUT AT GRID D AND GRID 7 IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE. 14. SHEET S104 (LEVELS 4 THROUGH 13 PLAN); SHEET S403 (DETAIL 242): DETAIL 242 CUT AT GRID C AND GRID 7 DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CUT IN THE RIGHT LOCATION. VERIFY. 15. SHEET S105; FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE THE SLAB THICKNESS ON THE PLAN. 16. SHEET S105 (LEVEL 14 PLAN); SHEET S403 (DETAIL 242): DETAIL 242 CUT AT GRID C AND GRID 7 DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CUT IN THE RIGHT LOCATION. VERIFY. 17. SHEET S105; LEVEL 14 PLAN: DETAIL 225 CUT AT GRID D AND GRID 7 IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE. 18. SHEET S106; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: IS THE 17" SLAB DESIGN IN THE SOUTHEAST PORTION OF THIS LEVEL IN THE CALCULATIONS? VERIFY. 19. SHEET S106; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 225 CUT AT GRID D AND GRID 7 IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE. 20. SHEET S106; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: SHEET NOTE 1 AT GRID C.1 AND GRID 1 INDICATES A BALCONY AT THIS LOCATION. VERIFY. 21. SHEET S106; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: DETAIL 311 CUT ON THE EAST WALL NEAR GRID LINE 7.1 HAS A RAISED SLAB EDGE, BUT DETAIL 313 CUT ON THE EAST WALL NEAR GRID LINE 6 DOES NOT HAVE THE RAISED SLAB. CLARIFY. 22. SHEET S107 (PENTHOUSE ROOF PLAN); SHEET S102 (STEEL COLUMN SCHEDULE): STEEL COLUMNS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED WITH A MARK PER THE COLUMN SCHEDULE. PROVIDE ON THE PLAN. 23. SHEET S107: THE TOP OF THE SHEET IS CUT OFF AT THE PLAN NOTES. REPLACE SHEET. 24. SHEET S201 (COLUMN SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (VOLUME 1, PAGE G98): THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDICATE COLUMN CC14 HAS 28-#11 VERTICAL BARS, WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES 24-#11 BARS. CLARIFY. 25. SHEET S201; COLUMN SCHEDULE: THE SCHEDULE INDICATES A COLUMN CC15, BUT THIS COLUMN WAS NOT FOUND IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY. 26. SHEET S204; DETAIL C: REVISE THE ARROW ON NOTE 1 TO THE HORIZONTAL REINFORCING. 27. SHEET S204; DETAIL G: THE DETAIL G TITLE IS GIVEN AS DETAIL C. REVISE. 28. SHEET S204; DETAIL G: WHAT DOES NOTE 7 ABOVE THE SLAB INDICATE? VERIFY AND REVISE DETAIL. 29. SHEET S204; DETAILS H AND I: NOTE 6 SHOULD BE NOTED ON THE DETAIL (REPLACE ONE OF THE NOTE 5'S). VERIFY. 30. SHEET S301; DETAIL 109: NOTE 2 INDICATES A STEEL STUD, BUT IT IS DEPICTED AS A WALL BEYOND (PER DETAIL 108). CLARIFY. 31. SHEET S301; DETAIL 110: NOTE 4 INDICATES A STUD WALL AND NOTE 5 INDICATES TOPPING, BUT BOTH ARE DEPICTED AS BEYOND. CLARIFY. 32. SHEET S301; DETAIL 102: SHOULD THERE BE EXPANSION MATERIAL INDICATED AT THE SLAB? VERIFY. 33. SHEET S301; DETAIL 102: MOVE NOTE 9 AS REQUIRED. 34. SHEET S301; DETAIL 105: INDICATE ON NOTE 6 WHICH ANGLE LEG IS HORIZONTAL/VERTICAL. 35. SHEET S301; DETAIL 113: SHOULD THERE BE EXPANSION MATERIAL INDICATED AT THE SLAB? VERIFY. 36. SHEET S302; DETAIL 115: SHOULD THERE BE EXPANSION MATERIAL INDICATED AT THE SLAB? VERIFY. 37. SHEET S302; DETAIL 118: SHOULD THERE BE EXPANSION MATERIAL INDICATED AT THE SLAB AT THE RETAINING WALL? VERIFY. 38. SHEET S302; DETAIL 120: SHOULD THERE BE EXPANSION MATERIAL INDICATED AT THE SLAB? VERIFY. 39. SHEET S302; DETAIL 121: CHANGE THE REFERENCE IN NOTE 6. 40. SHEET S403; DETAIL 235: NOTE 5 SHOULD BE NOTED ON THE DETAIL. VERIFY. 41. SHEET S403; DETAIL 237: NOTES 1 AND 6 SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE NOTES. 42. SHEET S403; DETAIL 237: NOTE 5 SHOULD BE NOTED ON THE DETAIL. VERIFY. 43. SHEET S403 (DETAILS 243 AND 244); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS : PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AT THE TRELLIS. INDICATE THE TRELLIS ON THE PLAN. 44. SHEET S403; DETAIL 248: IN NOTE 2, PROVIDE THE PLATE LENGTH AND INDICATE THE PLATE ON THE DETAIL. 45. SHEET S403; DETAIL 248: IN NOTE 4, PROVIDE THE PLATE SPACING. 46. SHEET S403; DETAIL 249: REVISE THE ARROW HEADS. 47. SHEET S403; DETAIL 251: IN NOTES 5 AND 6, PROVIDE THE BAR SPACING. 48. SHEET S501; DETAIL 304: IN NOTE 3, INDICATE THE WALL REINFORCING SPACING FOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL BARS. 49. SHEET S501 (DETAIL 313); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AT THE SCREENWALL. INDICATE THE SCREENWALL ON THE PLAN. 50. SHEET S601; DETAIL 407: CLEAR-UP THE VERBIAGE. 51. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; VOLUME 1 (SHEET G1): FOOTING F4 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THIS KEY PLAN. PROVIDE. 52. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; VOLUME 1 (SHEET G1): PROVIDE THE FOOTING REFERENCES ON THE CALCULATION KEY PLAN (F1, F2, ETC.) FOR ALL FOOTINGS INDICATED ON SHEET S100. 53. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; VOLUME 1 (SHEET G24): COLUMN CC3 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THIS KEY PLAN. PROVIDE. 54. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; VOLUME 1 (SHEET G24): PROVIDE THE COLUMN REFERENCES ON THE CALCULATION KEY PLAN (CC1, CC2, ETC.)FOR ALL COLUMNS INDICATED ON SHEET S100 AND S201. 55. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; VOLUME 1 (PAGES G1 THROUGH G101): ARE THE CONCRETE COLUMN DESIGNS INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN UP TO THE ROOF LEVEL? THE COLUMN SCHEDULE ON SHEET S201 INDICATES VARYING VERTICAL REINFORCING, BUT IT WASN'T CLEAR IF THIS SHOWED UP IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY. 56. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; VOLUME 1: THE INDEX INDICATES THE POST TENSION SLAB DESIGN ON PAGES PT1 THROUGH PT63. THESE ARE NOT IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY. 57. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; VOLUME 1: PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF THE SHEARWALL DESIGNS, INCLUDING WALL THICKNESS AND REINFORCING FOR THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE WALL. 58. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BY RON BROWN GENERAL 59. At all floor plans, for all stairs and ramps: a. Please indicate a directional arrow starting from the finished floor of the particular plan level and identify it as either up or down. b. Please provide grade elevations at the top and bottom landings of all ramps. c. Calculate the exact ramp slope percentage and show it on the drawings. d. Please provide a large scale detail of all ramps and stairs showing all the above requirements. SHEET A002 60. At the Fire Resistance Requirements, please fix the small 3, 30 FEET to proper < symbol. 61. Your lobby area occupancy load should be considered as assembly, standing and have a ratio of 1/5 and not a residential ratio of 1/200. Please recalculate and adjust the exiting calculation and make needed adjustments as required. SHEET A100 62. Relocate the most westerly accessible parking space to the east side of the accessible parking aisle at the north elevator wall. 63. Why no concrete wheel stops at the accessible parking spaces? SHEET A101 64. Extend the accessible parking aisle markings to both accessible parking aisles for an accessible route connection to the entrance door. 65. As required by ICC A117.1, Section 502.4.3, the accessible parking aisle is to extend the full length of the parking space. Please relocate the mechanical duct chase at the most westerly accessible parking aisle for accessible parking compliance. 66. Ditto comment 62. 67. Where is the drinking fountain? 68. Where is the accessible parking sign for the most westerly accessible parking space? 69. The overhead door is not an accepted exit door. Please provide a narrower overhead door and provide a man door for an accepted exit as indicated by all other plans of this area. SHEET A120 70. Ditto comment 67. 71. Please provide a detail reference for the receptionist desk. SHEET A612 72. Details 2 and 3 show different height dimensions for the same flight of stairs. Please reconcile. SHEET A801 73. Please show the side elevation of the water closet so you may also show the required vertical handrail as per ICC A1171.1, section 604.5.1. 74. Please call out all wall finishes for all public toilet room elevations to show compliance with the 2006 IBC, Section 12010.2. SHEET A802 75. The sink height dimension required for a Type "A" unit are not shown on the referenced details as Type "A" from the Kitchen Type Matrix schedule. Please provide a 2'-10" for all the reference type "A" unit details. SHEET A803 76. Ditto comment 80 for Type 1A. SHEET A805 77. Detail needs a 2'-10" sink counter top height. 78. Show heights on drinking fountain. SHEET A908 79. Reference the fire rating of the laundry chute assembly including all access doors. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/24/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED PER NFPA 72 AND ALL HIGH RISE PROVISIONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE CONTROL ROOM. SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO NFPA 13 STANDARDS. NO EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED. SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACCEPTANCE TEST AND WITNESSED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT. PERMITS FOR FIRE ALARM AND FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM ARE SEPARATE AND REQUIRED. EXIT ILLUMINATION AND SIGNAGE WILL BE VERIFIED DURING FINAL INSPECTION. EMERGENCY GENERATOR PERMIT IS REQUIRED. |
| 06/04/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/05/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the plumbing code to be used for this activity. The Code Information on sheet P0.1 refers to the 2006 UPC but the Codes note on the cover sheet refers to the 2006 IPC. The water piping has been calculated per the 2006 UPC but the roof drains have been calculated per the 2006 IPC. In addition, the relief vent stacks appear to have been designed almost to the requirements of the UPC, but not quite correctly. This review has been made using the 2006 IPC, as was the foundation only design package (T12CM00933). 2. Coordinate the number of fixtures used to calculate the water demand with the fixtures shown on the drawings. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 3. Correct the boiler/storage tank detail called out as being 2/P5.1 on sheet P1.6 to 3/P3.4. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 4. Correct the domestic water piping detail called out as being 1/P5.1 on sheet P1.5 to 3/P3.4. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 5. Clarify the information shown in the pump schedule on sheet P0.1. Are there really 3500 CP-1 pumps? What is a VDS or a VDFS? 6. Provide individual metering for the water supply to all new dwelling units. The metering may be private or utility installed. Reference: Section 301.4.1, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 7. Provide fixture descriptions and material standards for all plumbing fixtures. Reference: Sections 303.4 and 402, IPC 2006. 8. Show that tempered water for the lavatories is being provided using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2006. 9. Provide shower control valves that comply with the requirements of Section 424.5, IPC 2006. 10. Domestic water riser diagram 1/P3.4 shows the water supply to the 1st floor being supplied from the high-pressure side of the booster pumps. Provide a water pressure regulator conforming to ASSE 1003 for the cold water piping for the 1st floor to limit the water pressure to 80 PSI or less. Reference: Section 604.8, IPC 2006. 11. Provide pressure-absorbing devices for the water connections to appliances equipped with quick-acting or solenoid valves (e.g. clothes washers). Reference: Section 604.9, IPC 2006. 12. Provide the material standards for the water service and water distribution piping materials and fittings. Show that the materials have a minimum rated working pressure at least equal to the highest available water pressure. Reference: Sections 605.3 and 605.5, IPC 2006. 13. Provide a low-pressure cutoff for the booster pump per Section 606.5.5, IPC 2006. 14. Clarify how the boiler/storage tank piping diagram complies with Section 607.2.3, IPC 2006. 15. Show how thermal expansion of the hot water system is being provided. Reference: section 607.3, IPC 2006. 16. Keynote 2 for domestic water riser diagram 1/P3.4 calls for 45 PSI water to be supplied to each floor but the water schematic D/P3.1 calls for the floor pressure to be set for 60 PSI; which pressure will be used? Show how the water piping has been sized for delivery to the building floors. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 17. Show the plan view of the waste piping for the boiler room and limit the distance of the fixture traps from their vents per Table 906.1, IPC 2006. 18. Provide relief vents for the waste stacks serving 10 stack intervals. Reference: Section 914.1, IPC 2006. 19. Provide a floor drain for the fire pump room and ensure that the floor is pitched away from the critical equipment per Section 5.12.6, NFPA 20-2003 and Section 913.1, IFC 2006. |
| 06/07/2012 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Dan Santa Cruz Plan review |
| 06/07/2012 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Show that the mechanical systems for the building comply with the requirements of the 2006 International Energy Conservation Code. 3. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Specify the insulation to be used for the chilled water piping on this project. Reference: Section 503.2.8, IECC 2006. 5. Provide structural details to show how the fan coil units are to be supported from the building structure (i.e. how are the supports for the fan coil connected to the post-tensioned slab). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 6. Show that the 1st level parking garage has mechanical ventilation per Section 404.2, IMC 2006. 7. Show how the occupied accessory spaces (e.g. elevator lobby, service room, etc.) in the sublevel are maintained at a positive pressure with regard to the parking garage. Reference: Sections 403.3 and 404.3, IMC 2006. 8. Clarify keynote 8 on sheet M1.2; it calls out a condensate drain but points to an exhaust duct in one location and to a condensate drain in another location. Similarly, keynote 3 on sheet M1.5 points to a duct sensor on fan coil FC-15 and keynote 2 on sheet M1.6 indicates that EF-11 is ducted up to EF-3. 9. Correct keynote 3 on sheet M2.8; the note calls for a "combination fire smoke detector" but it should be a "combination fire smoke damper". 10. Clarify the drawings noted for details or continuations. Some of the drawings called out do not exist (e.g. "M5.0-") or lead to inappropriate details (e.g. a note on detail 3/M5.2 leads to detail 1/M6.1) 11. Clarify the routing of the duct from SF-3 from "between the pool deck and the roof" (sheet M1.6) and its continuation on the 14th floor (sheet M1.5). 12. Clarify the air balance data for EF-3; is the total air flow 1500 CFM, 1575 CFM, or 1625 CFM? What is the total air flow for: EF-5: 2925 CFM, 3000 CFM, or 3125 CFM? EF-7: 4525 CFM or 4700 CFM? EF-9: 1500 CFM or 1625 CFM? |
| 06/07/2012 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM02811 1020 N Tyndall AV 14 Story Student Housing Tower The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following, address each and indicate how each was addressed. 1. Sheet E500, please verifyovercurrent and fuse (350) amp shown for Fire Pump is code compliant with NEC 695.4.(B).1 for locked rotor current. 2. Provide fault current available at Fire Controller. 3. Provide detail on how feeder line tap is to be made,include hardware type to be used. 4. Sheet E500, revise Riser Line Diagram and Panel Schedules due to multiple discreptancies including: A. Breaker Panel Notes (E500) do not coincide with Panel Schedules shown on Plan Sheets, example, see feeders line and loads for Panel EH1 and Panel Schedule.Also see Panel feeder sizes, over-current devices and AIC at Panels. B. Provide Aic ratings on the one line diagram sheet, the chart does not seem to correspond with Panel ratings. C. Not all breaker values shown on panel schedules. D. Residential Panels show 125 amp typical, and main breaker, Panel Schedules E505-506 indicate 200 amp with MLO ? 3. Sheet E601, a second door for egress is required in main electrical room per 2005 NEC 110.26.(C).2. Dan Santa Cruz, PDSD, City of Tucson Electrical Plan Review, 6/7/2012 520-909-5173 |
| 06/08/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them on this review. Please address all reviewer's comments and resubmit. Zoning will review the plans on the next submittal and approve the plans if possible. While zoning has done a review and finds the plans to be consistent with the approved development package plans, zoning cannot approve the plans until the structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing reviewers have given their approval. 1. on sheet A001 under the Site Data text block, revise the rezoning case number to C9-12-01. |
| 06/14/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. 14- STORY STUDENT HOUSING TOWER DP12-0009 - 181FU @ COMMERCIAL RATE FOR COMMON AREAS ADN 4408 FU @ SFR RATE FOR APARMENTS 2. NEED CAPACITY REVIEW - KURT STEMM 740-6534 3. NEED PCRWRD REVIEW OF LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - CHAD AMATEAU 740-6547 4. NEED 3-MANHOLE TAP CONSTRUCTION PERMITS - WASTEWATER 1ST FLOOR DENICE ELLIE 740-6369 5. NEED PCRWRD REVIEW OF AREA DRAINS CONNECTED TO SEWER WITH SAND & OIL INTERCEPTORS - TOM TOMCHAK 724-6200 - 3035 W EL CAMINO DEL CERRO |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Approved |