Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM02654
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/24/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | THIS APPROVAL IS FOR THE CANOPY ONLY. THE SPRAY BOOTH AND MIXING ROOM ARE NOTED AS "BY OTHERS". ANOTHER SUBMITTAL WITH THOSE ENGINEERED DRAWINGS WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| 05/29/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET CS (PROJECT DATA); SHEET A1.00 (FLOOR PLAN): PROVIDE ON SHEET CS THE SQUARE FOOTAGE NUMBERS OF THE NEW FACILITIES AS INDICATED ON SHEET A1.00. 2. SHEET CS; SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: REMOVE THE CONCRETE FROM THIS LIST. 3. SHEET A3.00; DETAIL 3: IF THE DISTANCE FROM THE SLAB TO GRADE BELOW IS MORE THAN 30 INCHES, A GUARD RAIL WILL BE REQUIRED PER THE 2006 IBC, SECTION 1013. VERIFY. 4. SHEET GSN: THERE ARE MANY NOTES THAT ARE NOT PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT. VERIFY AND REMOVE THOSE NOTES. 5. SHEET GSN: PROVIDE NOTES FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL (TUBES AND WIDE FLANGES) AND THEIR CONNECTIONS IN THE GENERAL NOTES. 6. SHEET GSN: PROVIDE NOTES FOR THE CANOPY ROOF AND WALL PANELS. 7. SHEET GSN: PROVIDE NOTES FOR THE COLD FORMED STEEL. 8. SHEET S1.1; SOUTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS: THE WALL PANELS ARE DESIGNATED AS 26#. REVISE TO INDICATE GAGE. 9. SHEET S1.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: THE ROOF SHEATHING IS DESIGNATED AS 22#. REVISE TO INDICATE GAGE. 10. SHEET S1.1 (EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS); SHEET SD (DETAIL 1.C): THE ELEVATIONS INDICATE 1.C/SD IS A TYPICAL DETAIL, BUT IS IT AT THE CORRECT LOCATION ON THE ELEVATIONS? VERIFY. 11. SHEET S1.1 (EAST, WEST, AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS); SHEET SD (DETAILS 6 AND 7): THE ELEVATIONS INDICATE A THICKENED SLAB AT THE WALL AND COLUMN FOOTINGS, WHILE THE DETAILS INDICATE A CONCRETE COLUMN OR STEM WALL EXTENDING A MAXIMUM OF 2'-6" ABOVE GRADE. COORDINATE AND REVISE DRAWINGS. THE NOTE ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN CONCERNING THE TURNDOWN SLAB VERSUS THE RETAINING WALL SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD, NOT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 12. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/30/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/30/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/30/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Verify that the 12" exhaust stack from the mix room is located at least 6'-0" from the adjacent wall of the existing building. Reference: Section 501.2.1(1), IMC 2006. 2. Show how adequate makeup air is to be introduced into the mix room to provide pressure equalization. Reference: Section 501.3, IMC 2006. |
| 06/06/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM02654 6001 E Speedway Paint Booth Addition Please provide information on Paint Booth concerning electrical connections, for electrical plan review and inspectors . Ray T Majuta Electrical Plan Review PDSD, City of Tucson 6/6/12 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/15/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed |