Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM02222
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/27/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
05/02/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
05/02/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET C0.0; CODE INFORMATION: ADD THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 TO THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE. 2. SHEET C0.0; GENERAL NOTES AND SQUARE FOOTAGE: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 3. SHEETS A0.1 AND A0.2; SHEET TITLE: THE SITE PLAN TITLE INDICATES "FOR REFERENCE ONLY". CLARIFY. 4. SHEET A0.2; REFUSE WALL SECTION: THIS SECTION SHOULD BE NUMBERED 2, NOT 3. REVISE. 5. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN. 6. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: IN TWO LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN (NEAR NOTE 4), A SYMBOL INDICATES "S1". CLARIFY. 7. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: ON THREE WALLS THERE ARE ELEVATIONS A/A2.0, B/A2.0, AND C/A2.0. REVISE (NO ELEVATIONS A, B, AND C ON SHEET A2.0). 8. SHEET A1.4; PLAN NOTES: NOTE 3 REFERENCES DETAIL 12/A5.0. REVISE. 9. SHEET A1.4; ROOF PLAN: ON TWO WALLS THERE ARE ELEVATIONS A/A2.0 AND C/A2.0. REVISE. 10. SHEET A2.0; GENERAL NOTES: NOTE D INDICATES A NOTE 10 ON SHEET SP. REVISE (THERE IS NO SHEET SP). 11. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATION KEYNOTES (NOTES 30, 32, 46, AND 51): ADD THE REFERENCE TO THESE NOTES. 12. SHEET A2.1; ELEVATION A: AT THE OLD NAVY SIGNAGE, A DETAIL REFERENCES 1/A11-0. REVISE (THERE IS NO SHEET A11-0). 13. SHEET A2.2b; SECTION 3: AT THE SIGNAGE, A DETAIL REFERENCES 2/A11-0. REVISE. 14. SHEET A2.2c; SECTIONS 1, 2, AND 3: AT THE PARAPET, A DETAIL REFERENCES 9/A2.2c. REVISE. 15. SHEET A2.2c; SECTION 1: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE NEAR THE 103'-4" ELEVATION. 16. SHEET A6.0; DETAIL 1: PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE DOWNSPOUT TO THE EDGE OF THE SPLASH BLOCK. 17. SHEET S0.1; FOUNDATIONS: NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOILS REPORT WAS USED IN THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 18. SHEET S0.1 (STRUCTURAL STEEL); SHEET S1.2 (T27): THE GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES INDICATE BOLTS IN STEEL CONNECTIONS TO MEET ASTM A307, WHILE THE BOLT SCHEDULE INDICATES ASTM A325. CLARIFY. 19. SHEET S4.1; SECTION 117: THE 1'-6" DIMENSION TO THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING SHOULD BE MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE SLAB. REVISE. 20. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE LEDGER ANGLES AND LINTEL BEAMS WERE NOT FOUND IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY. 21. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE BASE PLATE DESIGN WAS NOT FOUND FOR COLUMN C2. VERIFY. 22. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
05/04/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
05/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. |
05/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
05/08/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
05/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Correct the keynotes shown on sheet A0.1 (e.g. keynotes 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, etc.). Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. 2. Clarify the plumbing code to be used for this activity. The plumbing code information on sheet P1.1 refers to the 2006 UPC but the code information on sheet C0.0 refers to the 2006 IPC. This review has been made using the 2006 UPC. 3. Provide the dimensions for the roof drainage scuppers and downspouts (see detail 6/A6.0). Reference: Sections 1101.11.1 and 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2006. |
05/10/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
05/21/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |