Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM02060
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/23/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 350 E Congress Street T12CM02060 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 20, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 04/25/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/25/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the plumbing code to be used for this activity. The City of Tucson allows either the 2006 UPC or the 2006 IPC (both with local amendments) to be used but the documents must indicate which code is being used. This review has been made using the 2006 IPC and covers only the underground plumbing. 2. Provide cleanouts for all horizontal drains. Reference: Section 708.3.1, IPC 2006. 3. Provide a cleanout at the base of each waste stack. Reference: Section 708.3.4, IPC 2006. 4. Provide a cleanout at the base of each roof drain stack prior to connection to the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Section 708.3.4, IPC 2006. 5. Provide cleanouts for all horizontal rainwater drains; the cleanouts shall not be located greater than 100-feet apart, measured from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. Reference: Section 708.3.1, IPC 2006. |
| 04/25/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Clarify the size of the water meters to be used for this building. The calculations on sheet P401g call for three 2" water meters to serve a demand of 300 GPM and sheet P201Ag calls out a 3" water meter for the same demand. In addition, sheet P201Ag also shows another 2" water meter to serve a different 100 GPM demand. Tucson Water limits a 2" meter to a maximum demand of 80 GPM and does not allow the use of manifolded water meters. Verify the sizes of the water meters to be used with Tucson Water and coordinate the drawings and calculations. |
| 04/27/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET FLS00g: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 2. SHEET FLS01g; FIRE LIFE SAFETY PLAN LEVEL 1: AT THE RETAIL SHELL BUILDING, THE NORTHERNMOST EXIT INDICATES 323 OCCUPANTS EXIT AT THIS LOCATION. IS THAT CORRECT? VERIFY. 3. SHEET FLS01g; FIRE LIFE SAFETY PLAN LEVEL 1: AT THE RETAIL SHELL BUILDING, INDICATE THE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS EXITING AT THE WEST EXIT. 4. SHEET A201Ag (LEVEL 1 PLAN); SHEET S101g (FOUNDATION PLAN): THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING SHOWS NO MASONRY WALLS ON THE FIRST FLOOR AT THE NORTH STAIR, WHILE THE STRUCTURAL DRAWING SHOWS MASONRY WALLS AT THAT LOCATION ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN, AND MASONRY WALLS AT THE MEZZANINE FRAMING PLAN (ON SHEET S101g). CLARIFY. 5. SHEET S001; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): THE DESIGN OF THE FOUNDATION SYSTEMS WAS BASED ON A SOIL REPORT AS STATED. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 6. SHEET S002; SPECIAL INSPECTION: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE STARTING AT STEEL NOTE 6 AND CONTINUING DOWN. 7. SHEET S002; SPECIAL INSPECTION: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 8. SHEET S101g; FOUNDATION PLAN: AT GRIDS WA AND W1, CHANGE THE 48" DIMENSION TO 4'-0" (THREE LOCATIONS). 9. SHEET S101g; FOUNDATION PLAN: AT GRIDS WA AND W5, ADD THE 4'-0" DIMENSION TO THE FOOTING (TWO DIRECTIONS). 10. SHEET S101g; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE STEEL COLUMN AT GRIDS WB AND W1 HAS NO DESIGNATION. PROVIDE. 11. SHEET S101g; FOUNDATION PLAN: IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS, THERE ARE DIMENSIONS (AT FOOTINGS AND WALLS) THAT ARE INDICATED IN INCHES (E.G. 48"). REVISE THESE TO FEET AND INCHES. 12. SHEET S101g (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET L60): SW6 INDICATES IN THE CALCULATIONS 2-#6 EACH CELL FOR THE P1 PORTION, BUT THIS IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN (MW6). VERIFY. 13. SHEET S101g (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET L67): SW9 INDICATES IN THE CALCULATIONS 2-#5 EACH CELL FOR THE P1 PORTIONS, BUT THIS IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN (MW5). VERIFY. 14. SHEET S101g (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET L67): SW10 AND SW12 INDICATE IN THE CALCULATIONS 2-#5 EACH CELL FOR THE P1 PORTION, BUT THIS IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN (MW5). VERIFY. 15. SHEET S101g (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET L75): SW13 INDICATES IN THE CALCULATIONS 2-#5 EACH CELL FOR THE P1 PORTION, BUT THIS IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN (MW5). VERIFY. 16. SHEET S101g (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET L75): SW21 INDICATES IN THE CALCULATIONS 2-#6 EACH CELL FOR THE P1 PORTION, 2-#6 EACH CELL FOR THE P3 PORTION, AND #6 AT 8" OC WITH 2-#6 IN THE END CELLS FOR THE P2 PORTION, BUT THIS IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN (MW6). VERIFY. 17. SHEET S101g (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET L75): SW22 REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE CALCULATIONS DO NOT MATCH THE REINFORCING SHOWN ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 18. SHEET S101g (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET L85): SW24 REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE CALCULATIONS DO NOT MATCH THE REINFORCING SHOWN ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 19. SHEET S101g (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET L85): SW36 REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE CALCULATIONS (2-#5 FOR 3 END CELLS) DO NO MATCH THE REINFORCING SHOWN ON THE PLAN (NO NOTE 2). VERIFY. 20. SHEET S101g; FOUNDATION PLAN: A PLAN NOTE AT GRIDS GE AND G1 REFERENCES TYPICAL DETAIL 10/S002. REVISE. 21. SHEET S101g; FOUNDATION PLAN: CLARIFY THE PLAN NOTE "TURNDOWN PLUS 3'-0" STRIP". 22. SHEET S102g (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (INDEX): THESE SHEETS REFERENCE A "PODIUM" LEVEL. NO REFERENCE WAS MADE TO A PODIUM LEVEL IN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. COORDINATE. 23. SHEET S102g (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET R15): THE HORIZONTAL FRAME MEMBER IS DESIGNED AS A W16X31 IN THE CALCULATIONS, BUT THE DRAWINGS INDICATE A W16X26. CLARIFY. 24. SHEET S102g (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE FOUND FOR THE ROOF FRAMING AT THE RETAIL SHELL, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF FRAMES F1 AND F2. VERIFY. 25. SHEET S102g (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE FOUND FOR THE MASONRY LINTELS AT THE RETAIL SHELL. VERIFY. 26. SHEET S102g; FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NOTE ON THIS PLAN INDICATING A REFERENCE FOR THE ROOF ELEVATIONS (OR JOIST BEARING ELEVATIONS) AT THE RETAIL SHELL. 27. SHEET S102g; FRAMING PLAN: INDICATE A LEDGER ANGLE ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE N.E. WALL AT THE RETAIL SHELL. 28. SHEET S102g (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S901 (DETAIL 615): THE DETAIL INDICATES 3 1/2 X 3 1/2 X 1/4 ANGLE BRACES AT 48" OC, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES 4 X 4 X 1/4 ANGLE BRACES AT EACH JOIST. COORDINATE. 29. SHEET S102g; FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A JOIST SPACING ON THE ROOF FRAMING AT THE RETAIL SHELL. 30. SHEET S901; DETAIL 610: REVISE THE DETAIL TITLE. 31. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE SUMMARY SHEETS IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATING AXIAL, SHEAR, AND MOMENT LOADINGS TO ALL COLUMN FOOTINGS, FOOTING SIZES, AND REINFORCEMENT. REFERENCE THOSE FOOTINGS TO THE GRIDLINES INDICATED ON SHEET S101g OR SIMILAR GRIDLINES INDICATED ON A KEY PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS. THERE ARE SEVERAL FOOTINGS THAT HAVE NO DESIGN CALCULATIONS. 32. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; L SHEETS: CALCULATIONS FOR REINFORCING REQUIREMENTS WERE NOT LOCATED FOR SW1, SW2, SW3, SW7, SW8, SW14, SW16-20. SW23, SW25-28, AND SW30-40. VERIFY. 33. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; L SHEETS: CALCULATIONS FOR FOOTINGS WERE NOT LOCATED FOR ALL SHEARWALLS. VERIFY. 34. GENERAL: FOR REVIEW PURPOSES, SEPARATION OF THE GREYHOUND STRUCTURE FROM THE RAILYARD STRUCTURE IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WOULD HAVE MADE THIS REVIEW MUCH EASIER. 35. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 04/27/2012 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | This review is for foundation and 1st. level shell, electrical. Includes; services, U.G. for generator, feeder stubs for future retail spaces, fire pump. Fitup not on this review. Dan Santa Cruz |
| 05/01/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | These review comments should also be used for T12CM02061. The reason for not approving the foundation only permit is due to the stairway that might need to be relocated. If this issue is addressed, then fire could approve the foundation only permit. Corrections noted are: 1. Provide approval of the Alternative materials, design, and methods request from the Building Code Officail as indicated on sheet FLS00g 2. Indicate on site plan that 3,750 GPM for 4 hours is the required fire flow and show 4 hydrants that are available or the ones to be added to have the minimum 4. 3. Remove any comments about automatic sprinklers not being required. The entire structure is required to be protected with an approved NFPA 13 sprinkler system and it is confusing that sheet FLS00g is indicating certain occupancies are not required to have this protection. 4. Exception 2 under Section 905 on sheet FLS00g is incorrect. 5. On sheet FLS01g level 1- the sliding door is not approved for exiting. Revise plans. 6. All doors shall swing in the direction of exit travel when serving occupant loads over 50 per IFC 1008.1.2. Please revise. 7. More exit signs are required. Show the additional exit signs in stairwells and corridors that are required. 8. On sheet FLS01g Level 2 Stairwell-(GS2) and A521G I cannot figure out how the interior stairwell connects to the exterior exit staircase and how the fire rating is being maintained to the exit. 9. Exit signs shall be added per IFC 1011.1 and indicate that tactile signs will also be provided per IFC 1011.3. 10. Explain why the vertical exit enclosure (GS1) is provided but it does not exit to exterior of building on Level 1 on sheet FLS01g. See IFC 1019.3 11. Indicate the location of egress lighting and the method on the Fire and Life Safety Pages. 12. Indicate on the Fire and Life Safety Pages the stairway or stairways that have roof access. 13. Indicate elevator car size per IBC 3002.4 14. Revise or provide a legend for the fire rated walls indicated on the FLS pages. |
| 05/03/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. PLAZA CENTRO STUDENT HOUSING - GREYHOUND DP12-0030 - DOES NOT INCLUDE 1ST FLOOR SHELLED SPACE - 2797FU'S @SFR RATE = $740,114.17 AND 114FU'S @ COMMERCIAL RATE = $800,461.17 2. NEED PCRWRD REVIEW OF LOCATION OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - CHAD AMATEAU - 740-6547 - NEED MANHOLECONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVAL - 740-6369 3. NEED PCRWRD CAPACITY REVIEW - KURT STEMM - 740-6607 4. NEED WASTEWATER CREDIT EVALUATION - 740-6602 OR 740-6606 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/21/2012 | CPIERCE1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 05/21/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/21/2012 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |