Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T12CM01914
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/08/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS 1. Previous review comments 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 have not been addressed. They are all still non-compliant pertentant changes for the drawings. 2. In addition, the project data information manuals are not included with these resubmittals; i.e. project manual, structural calculations and written review comment responses. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/08/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/09/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning cannot approve this plan until the development package has been approved. |
| 05/14/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Provide information to show that the operation of the Type I hood and the hood exhaust fan complies with Section 507.2.1.1, IMC 2006. 2. Comment not addressed. Provide 18" clearance between the combustible-construction wall and the cook line shown in detail 3/A-1.2 (and in the detail on sheet M-3.0) or revise the construction of the wall as described in Section 507.9, IMC 2006. 3. Comment not addressed. Provide smoke detectors in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections, for all air distribution systems with a capacity greater than 2,000 CFM. Reference: Section 606.1, IMC 2006. |
| 05/14/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 2. Comment not addressed. Provide the site utility drawing referenced on sheet P-2.0, showing the proposed gravity grease interceptor, and the size, route, and slope of the building sewer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Comment not addressed. Provide the design for the water heater (P3) shelf referenced in detail 1/P-3.0. Reference: Section 314.5, UPC 2006. 4. Comment not addressed. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only (shown correctly in detail 6/P-4.0). Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 5. Comment not addressed. Appliances (e.g. chemical dispensers, ice tea makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006. 6. Comment not addressed. Each piece of equipment (e.g. carbonators) requiring backflow protection shall be independently protected. Reference: Sections 602.2 and 603.0, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 7. Comment not addressed. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for the ice maker and the ice storage bin. Reference: Section 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 8. Comment not addressed. Correct the sizes of the branch gas piping serving the fryers (21E) and the Chinese range (20Q); based on a developed pipe length of 150-feet, these pipes are too small. Reference: Section 1217.0, UPC 2006. |
| 05/14/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly (according to a note on sheet P-1.0, this information is shown on a site utility drawing that has not been submitted). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 05/18/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/25/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The DP/Site plan must be approved first. |
| 05/25/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/31/2012 | FRODRIG2 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |