Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM01899
Parcel: 10612017Q

Address:
1765 W PRINCE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T12CM01899
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/23/2012 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Dollar General - W. Prince Road
T12CM01899
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 18, 2012

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
04/25/2012 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 04/25/2012,

The building plans shall be approved after the Development Package is approved.
04/30/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Coordinate the size of the building drain as shown on sheet P1 with the building sewer shown on the civil drawings; the existing BCS is 3".
2. Verify the plumbing code to be used with this activity; the 2006 IPC as shown on the civil drawings or the 2006 UPC as shown on the plumbing drawing. Note that the 3" building sewer runs with a slope of 1.3% which is OK with the IPC but not with the UPC.
04/30/2012 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
04/30/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
04/30/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify how the five fan coils are being connected to the building structure. The air handling detail on sheet M1 is very different from the note on sheet E3 (Mid-West Steel Building Co.) and the location of the fan coils are not the same on the two drawings. Provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely by the installation of the fan coils. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
2. Condensate drains from air conditioning units may not terminate in an area that is not capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Clarify the termination point for the condensate drains; the civil drawings indicate a concrete pad is located at that location. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
05/01/2012 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET T2-C; GOVERNING CODES: ADD THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO THIS LIST.
2. SHEET T2-C; PROJECT INFORMATION: ON THE PLAN, SHOW PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRED/PROVIDED PER THE 2006 IBC TABLE 2902.1.
3. SHEET A1-C (FLOOR PLAN); AREA BY THE MOP SINK: A DETAIL AT THE MOP SINK IS DESIGNATED AS 4/A1. REVISE (NO DETAIL 4 ON SHEET A1).
4. SHEET A1-C; FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES: NOTES 6A AND 6B INDICATE METAL STUD PARTITIONS EXTENDING TO 6" ABOVE THE ACOUSTICAL CEILING HEIGHT. PROVIDE DETAILS AND STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS INDICATING THOSE WALLS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2006 IBC SECTION 1607.13. DETAILS SHOULD INCLUDE THE BRACING SIZE AND SPACING, CONNECTION OF THE BRACING TO THE TOP OF THE PARTITION, AND CONNECTION OF THE BRACING TO THE ROOF STRUCTURE.
5. SHEET A1-C; FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES: NOTE 9 REFERENCES SHEETS A3D, A3.1D, AND S1.D. CLARIFY.
6. SHEET A1-C; FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES: NOTE 11 REFERENCES DETAIL 3/A1D. CLARIFY.
7. SHEET A1-C; FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES: NOTE 13 REFERENCES DETAIL 3/A1D. CLARIFY.
8. SHEET A1-C; FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES: NOTE 22 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
9. SHEET A1-C; FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES: NOTE 23 REFERENCES SHEET S3 FOR CONTROL JOINTS. REVISE THE NOTE TO READ SHEET S3.C.
10. SHEET A1-C; FLOOR PLAN: THE WALL ELEVATION 1/A2 INDICATED ON THE LEFT ELEVATION (SHEET A2-C) IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
11. SHEET A1-C; FLOOR PLAN: THE WALL ELEVATION 2/A2 INDICATED ON THE RIGHT ELEVATION (SHEET A2-C) IS NOT CORRECT. REVISE.
12. SHEET A1-C; FLOOR PLAN: A DETAIL REFERENCE IN THE LOWER LEFT CORNER INDICATES 1A/A6. THERE IS NO DETAIL 1A ON SHEET A6. REVISE.
13. SHEET A1-C (FLOOR PLAN); BUILDING SECTION 1/A3: THE GRID LINES ARE DIFFERENT ON THE PLAN THAN ON THE SECTION. REVISE.
14. SHEET A1-C (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET S-1 (FOUNDATION PLAN): THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN (NOTE 10) INDICATES 6X6XW1.4 MESH IN THE SLAB, WHILE THE STRUCTURAL PLAN INDICATES 6X6 W2.1XW2.1 MESH. COORDINATE.
15. SHEET A2-C; ELEVATION KEYED NOTES: NOTE 20 REFERENCES DETAIL 3/A1D. CLARIFY.
16. SHEET A6-C; RESTROOM ELEVATIONS: LOCATE THE PAPER DISPENSER PER ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 FIGURE 604.7.
17. SHEET S-2; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE.
18. SHEET S-2; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: IN THE NOTES, PROVIDE THE GEOTECHNICAL COMPANY NAME THAT SUBMITTED THE REPORT, ALONG WITH THE REPORT NUMBER AND THE RECOMMENDED SOIL BEARING VALUE AS STATED IN THE REPORT.
19. SHEET S-2; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: IS MASONRY INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT? REMOVE NOTES IF NOT USED.
20. SHEET P2; DETAIL 2: REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS FOR THE WATER HEATER SUPPORT CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS. REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO SHEET A5-C. VERIFY.
21. GENERAL: ARE THERE NO ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT? VERIFY.
22. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
05/02/2012 CARL SCHULTZ FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate existing fire hydrant location(s), with dimensions to buildings and/or property lines. Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (section 508) for spacing and location requirements.

PG A1-C rear exit number 102 is not on door details PG A5-C
PG A4-C shows door 102 as a type C but no type C on details
05/08/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/14/2012 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed