Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM01683
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/17/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/17/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/17/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A1.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A3.0 (SECTION 2): THE BUILDING SECTION 2/A3.0 CUT ON THE PLAN SHOULD INDICATE IT IS LOOKING SOUTH (INDICATES NORTH ON THE PLAN). VERIFY. 2. SHEET A1.0; DETAILS 1 THROUGH 5: INDICATE THE DETAILS ON THE FLOOR PLAN. 3. SHEET A1.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 4. SHEET A1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 5. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: INDICATE BRACING AT THE NEW PARTITION WALLS TO RESIST LATERAL LOADS PER THE 2006 IBC, SECTION 1607.13. INCLUDE BRACING SIZE AND SPACING, AND CONNECTION OF BRACING TO THE TOP OF THE PARTITION WALL AND TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. 6. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: SHOULD THE DETAIL CUTS 1/A1.0 AND 2/A1.0 BE AT THIS LOCATION? VERIFY. 7. SHEET A4.0 (ROOF PLAN); SHEET A3.0: THE BUILDING SECTION 4/A3.0 CUT ON THE PLAN SHOULD BE 2/A3.0, AND INDICATE IT IS LOOKING SOUTH. 8. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 8): FOOTING F-1 IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES A 3'-4" SQUARE FOOTING, WHILE THE FOOTING SCHEDULE ON THE PLAN (F-2) INDICATES A 2'-8" SQUARE FOOTING. CLARIFY. 9. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET A3.0 (SECTION 2): THE BUILDING SECTION 2/A3.0 CUT ON THE PLAN SHOULD INDICATE IT IS LOOKING SOUTH. 10. SHEET S1.1; DETAIL 3: WHERE IS THIS DETAIL CUT OR REFERENCED ON THE DRAWINGS? VERIFY. 11. SHEET S2.0 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET A3.0: THE BUILDING SECTION 4/A3.0 CUT ON THE PLAN SHOULD BE 2/A3.0 AND INDICATE IT IS LOOKING SOUTH. 12. SHEET S2.0 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S2.1 (SECTION 5): CUT THE SECTIONS ON SHEET S2.1 ON THE FRAMING PLAN (SHEET S2.0). 13. SHEET S2.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 14. SHEET S2.1; DETAIL 2: A NOTE ON THE DETAIL INDICATES 2X6 STUDS, BUT AT THE BEAM BELOW, A CONNECTION IS INDICATED THAT SHOULD BE AT A COLUMN. CLARIFY. 15. SHEET S2.1; DETAIL 3: SEE COMMENT 14. 16. SHEET S3.0; FOUNDATION NOTES: INCLUDE THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING VALUE USED IN THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT AND REFERENCE THE CODE SECTION. 17. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/17/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/17/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 05/17/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/22/2012 | CPIERCE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 05/22/2012 | CPIERCE1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review |