Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM01496
Parcel: 14041127A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T12CM01496
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/06/2012 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Even "shell buildings" require fire sprinkler protection.
Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030.
2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D)
3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards.
4. The density required of the water supply.
Also, NFPA 231 and 231C were discontinued years ago. NFPA 13 is now the reference for all sprinkler criteria.
04/09/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
04/09/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
04/09/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Passed
04/10/2012 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A0.1; CODE INFORMATION: THE CURRENT FIRE CODE USED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON IS THE 2006 IFC. REVISE.
2. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN: RACKS GREATER THAN 12 FEET IN HEIGHT MUST HAVE CALCULATIONS AND CONNECTION DETAILS (RACK TO FLOOR) ON THE DRAWINGS. RACKS GREATER THAN 6 FEET IN HEIGHT UP TO 12 FEET IN HEIGHT REQUIRE CONNECTION DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS. PROVIDE AS REQUIRED. WILL THE RACKS BE CALCULATED AND DETAILED AS PART OF ANOTHER PERMIT? VERIFY.
3. SHEET A2.1; DETAILS 3 AND 5: THE SLAB INDICATED IN SECTION 5 IS THICKENED AT THE STAIR, WHILE DETAIL 3 DOES NOT INDICATED A THICKENED SLAB. CLARIFY.
4. SHEET A2.2; OFFICE PLAN 1: ADD NOTE 18 ON THE PLAN AT THE ELECTRIC WATER COOLER NEAR THE RESTROOMS.
5. SHEET A2.2; PLAN KEYED NOTES: NOTE 11 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE DRAWINGS. VERIFY.
6. SHEET A2.3; ROOF GENERAL NOTES: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE.
7. SHEET A3.1 (TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN 7 AND ELEVATIONS 8 AND 9); STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS: THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS INDICATE TO "SEE STRUCTURAL" FOR THE ENCLOSURE FOOTINGS. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE ENCLOSURE WALLS AND FOOTINGS.
8. SHEET A8.1; SECTION 2: A DETAIL 1/A8.2 SIM IS CUT THROUGH THE WINDOW SYSTEM. IS THIS CORRECT? VERIFY.
9. SHEET F2.2; SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE.
10. SHEET S2.1; STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE.
11. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE WALL PANEL DESIGNS WERE NOT LOCATED. VERIFY AND PROVIDE.
12. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
04/16/2012 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
04/16/2012 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
04/18/2012 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Approved
04/18/2012 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
04/26/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1. SHELL BUILDING - WAREHOUSE - DP12-033
2. NEED CIVIL UTILITY PLANS - NEED TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - DOES NOT FRONT PUBLIC SEWER - MAY NEED TO BUILD PUBLIC SEWER - NEED PCRWRD PUBLIC SEWER REVIEW & APPROVAL - NEED PUBLIC SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT - NEED HOLD HARMLESS LETTER
3. NO WASTEWATER PLUMBING STUB-OUTS - NO PLUMBING DRAWINGS ARE INCLUDED WITH THIS SHELL SUBMITTAL
4. NO TI'S UNTIL WASTEWATER SEWER CONNECTION FEES ARE PAID

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/08/2012 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed