Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM01355
Parcel: 110030290

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/WWM

Permit Number - T12CM01355
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/WWM
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/09/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1. NEED WASTEWATER CREDIT EVALUATION FOR DEMO OF EXISTING SFR PER DRAWINGS
2. NEED TO CLARIFY LAUDRY ROOM CLOTHES WASHER GREY WATER SYSTEM SHOWING DUAL CONNECTION 1 FOR SEWER & 1 FOR LANSCAPE
3. NEED TO CLARIFY CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - PLUMBING FLOOR PLANS SHOW CONNECTION TO REAR PROPERTY WHEN PLUBLIC SEWER IS LOCATED IN FRONT IN STREET
04/11/2012 KEN VAN KARSEN BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Denied T12CM01355
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS

Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes, along with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken.

SCOPE OF REVIEW:
The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2006 International Residential Code, 2006 International Energy Conservation Code, and Arizona State amendments to the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
Show corrections and revisions on original tracings or a finished reproducible set. Return two sets along with a set of the first submission for reference. Pen or pencil corrections on final prints will not be acceptable. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and notate sheets. (Do not cloud the changes made for comment revisions). Incorporate changes on originals and provide two copied sets for review.

All engineers and architects involved in the design of the structure are to seal the related sheets of plans, details and calculations in accordance with the rules of the State Board of Technical Registration.

GENERAL NOTES:

" Limit all code references to those recognized by the City of Tucson. Adopted 2006 codes are listed at the Planning & Development Services web site. Clarify the first General Note, sheet #7 and #1 Standards note, sheet #N-1.
" Revise the Inclusive Home Design notation for City of Tucson (Title & 1st paragraph) and electrical thermostat height 48".

FOUNDATION PLANS:

1. Indicate the slope for garage (carport) slab, R309.3. (R309.4).
2. Show compliance with termite treatment, R320.

FLOOR PLANS:

1. Show a maximum ½" floor elevation change at a notated accessible route entrance on the floor plan, R106.1.1.

STRUCTURAL PLANS:

1. Provide a header schedule and show existing opening sizes supporting new roof consistent with Table 502.5(1) & (2).
2. Provide manufacturer's calculations and data for pre-engineered trusses dated and wet-sealed by an engineer who is registered in Arizona, or notate the requirement for deferred submittal, R106.1.
3. Provide detail or notation for bracing the trusses at gable ends to prevent rotation and provide lateral stability, R802.10.3.

SECTIONS - DETAILS:

1. Clarify the location of the Stucco Siding detail referenced on the Wall Section details at sheet #7, R106.1.1.
2. Clarify the Mud Sill shown on the Wall Section details at sheet #7. Show wood framing members resting on concrete as pressure treated, R319.1 item 2.
3. Show the ceiling gypsum board as either 5/8" or ½" sag resistant when applied to 24" o/c ceiling framing, IRC table R702.3.5 footnote d.
4. Show fiber-cement board or glass mat gypsum backers for tiled walls in tub and shower areas, R702.4.2.

PLUMBING PLANS:

1. Show dual clothes washer standpipes. Provide one discharge opening plumbed to an exterior wall if feasible with an above grade stub-out for gray water surface distribution, or to the gray water collection system. Provide a second discharge opening plumbed to the building black line in compliance with the City of Tucson Ordinance #10579.

ELECTRICAL PLANS:

1. Show the location of each outlet on the Electrical Plan, E3305.1. Include circuit #30.
2. Show or notate a disconnect means or a locking breaker for the water heater, E4001.5.

OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE

1. Show the Shielding fixture style for Fixture 'A' as unshielded rather than Fully for consistency with the Total unshielded lumens entry.

If you have any questions please contact:
Ken Van Karsen
(520) 837-4912
City of Tucson Residential Plan Review
04/17/2012 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET 1 OF 10; SHEET INDEX: THE INDEX FOR SHEET 3 INDICATES FLOOR FRAMING. THERE IS NO FLOOR FRAMING ON THIS PROJECT (MAYBE SLAB CONFIGURATION?). REVISE.
2. SHEET 1 OF 10; SHEET INDEX: THE INDEX FOR SHEET 4 SHOULD INDICATE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. REVISE.
3. SHEET 2 OF 10 (FLOOR PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (HEADERS): THE CALCULATION HEADERS H1, H2, H3, AND H5 INDICATE 6X8 WOOD MEMBERS, WHILE THE PLAN SHOWS H1 AND H5 ARE 2X8'S, H2 AND H3 ARE 4X8'S. CLARIFY.
4. SHEET 3 OF 10; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE FOUNDATION NOTES ON SHEET 3 AND THE SECTION CUTS A1 AND A2 ON SHEET 7 INDICATE A CONVENTIONAL REINFORCED FOUNDATION/SLAB SYSTEM, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDE ONLY A POST-TENSIONED SLAB DESIGN. THE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION INDICATES A POST-TENSIONED SLAB DESIGN WILL BE USED (PAGE 7). CLARIFY AND REVISE THE DESIGN CALCULATIONS OR DETAILS AS REQUIRED.
5. SHEET 7 OF 10; SECTION A2: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE.
6. SHEET S-1; FOUNDATION PLAN: CLARIFY IF THIS PROJECT HAS A CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION (SHEET 3) OR A POST-TENSIONED SLAB, AND REMOVE THE SYSTEM FROM THE DRAWINGS THAT IS NOT BEING USED.
7. SHEET S-2; SHEARWALL TABLE, HOLD DOWN NOTES, AND LEGEND: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE.
8. SHEET S-2 (MAIN FLOOR PLAN); SHEET D-1 (DETAIL 3): THE PLAN ON S-2 INDICATES A DETAIL 3/D1, BUT THE DETAIL ON D-1 INDICATES IT WAS NOT USED. CLARIFY.
9. SHEET S-2 (MAIN FLOOR PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE TWO SEPARATE SHEAR WALLS (GROUP 1 AND GROUP 2), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES ONLY A SHEARWALL SW1. WAS THE GROUP 2 SHEARWALL NOT USED? CLARIFY.
10. GENERAL: PROVIDE A SITE PLAN WITH BOTH SETS FOR REVIEW.
11. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/23/2012 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed