Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM01334
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/26/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM01334 5870 E Broadway #488 Total Wine 1. Now that the circuitry for lighting has been marked, appears that some fixtures are circuited to the incorrect panels. Fixtures A,C,D,O,S and SS are rated 227 volt in the panel schedule, however located in Panel LA which is 120 volt. (Sheet E2.2) 2. Sheet E2.1 under Lifgting Plan Key Notes,indicates under #1 to provide contactor switches S1,S2,S3 and S4. Rather than give percentages of which circuits to go to each indicate which circuits by number will go to each. Show on plan where they will be located. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, C of Tucson 4/26/12 Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-4988 |
04/30/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006. 2. The Fixture Branch Connection Schedule on sheet P0.1 still indicates that the 3-compartment sink only has indirect waste connections; clarify that the wash and rinse compartments are to be directly-connected to sanitary waste. [Original comment: Provide an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment of the 3-compartment sink, with a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006.] |
04/30/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | RESPONSE 1: As per my comment 2, the non-compliant lettering is not limited to just SPEC 1-SPEC 7, it is evident is almost all disciplines of the submitted document package. If this was the only item of non-compliance, the document submittal package would not be denied. RESPONSE 2: Please provide structural calculations for detail 11/S0.2 showing that this detail and the supportive wall structure is structurally adequate for 240 pound water heaters. RESPONSE 3: Signage and detail location instructions that are not compliant with ICC A117.1 are still included on sheet A7. Please rework your signage details and specification to comply with ICC ANSI 117.1, Section 703. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
05/03/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | REJECT SHELF | Completed |