Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM01293
Parcel: 11808002P

Address:
601 W 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T12CM01293
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/27/2012 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
03/28/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
03/28/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration, states that a notation shall be placed beneath the seal, either written, typed, or electronically generated, that provides the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration. (Effective March 8, 2008).
2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch (see the EM and R drawings). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
3. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet (not Oro Valley). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
4. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 814.0, UPC 2006.
5. Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson allows the use of the ASHRAE 62-1-2004 ventilation calculation procedure provided that the default occupant densities are used.
6. Show how the refrigeration penthouse complies with the ventilation requirements of Section 1105.6, IMC 2006.
03/29/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration, states that a notation shall be placed beneath the seal, either written, typed, or electronically generated, that provides the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration. (Effective March 8, 2008).
2. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water, immediately downstream of the water meter. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
3. Clarify the specification for EWH-1; the model number in the schedule is not shown on the Eemax website and they don't appear to make any storage-type water heaters. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
4. Provide a specification for EWH-2. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
5. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2006.
6. Provide a direct waste connection for the eyewashes. Reference: Section 802.1, IPC 2006.
7. Revise detail 7/M5.2 for the hub drains to show that they meet the installation requirements of Section 802.3.2, IPC 2006 for extending at least 1" above a water-impervious floor.
8. Limit the fixture branches in the combination waste and vent system to the lengths shown in Table 906.1, IPC 2006. Reference: Section 912.2.4, IPC 2006.
9. Clarify the size of the branch drains as shown on the combination waste and vent riser diagram; detail 1/M5.2 calls for the trap and branch line to be two pipe sizes larger than the fixture tail piece but the fixture branches are all shown as being 3" and the tail pieces of the floor drains, trenches, and floor sinks are all scheduled as being 3". Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
10. Coordinate the combination waste and vent riser diagram with the plumbing plan. The plumbing plan shows a 3" VTR for each of the three hub drains (labeled "HB" on the diagram?) located next to the freezer but no such vents are shown on the riser diagram. Also, on the plumbing plan, the fixture branch of the floor sink from the coffee station joins the 4" branch of the combination waste and vent system prior to joining with the 6" branch of the combination waste and vent system. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
11. Coordinate the sanitary riser diagram with the plumbing plan; the north branch of the sanitary system shows an additional floor cleanout on the plumbing plan that is not included in the riser diagram. In addition, the location of the 6" branch, labeled "OPD" on the riser diagram is not shown on the plumbing plan. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
12. The installation of building traps is prohibited. Reference: Section 1002.6, IPC 2006.
13. Coordinate detail 11/M5.2 with the plumbing plan and riser diagram. The detail shows a hot water recirculation system being installed with water heaters DWH-1 and DWH-2 but no return hot water piping is shown on sheets M1.3 or M4.1.
14. Where does detail 13/M5.2 occur? Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
03/29/2012 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied GENERAL
1. Please provide structural calculations for the following:
a. The rigid steel frame building foundation. The canopy foundation calculations were included.
b. All roof top mounted HVAC equipment.
c. Electrical light pole foundations.
2. Please provide special inspection certifications as outlined on sheet S1.0.
3. For the purpose of assessing additional permit review fees, please provide a written summary of all intended deferred submittals on an 8.5 x 11 letter head stationary to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose at ron.boose@tucsonaz.gov.
SHEET A6.2
4. Toilet 116 does not meet 5'-0" diameter turn around space as required by ICC A117.1, Section 304.3.1 and 603.2.1.
SHEETS A5.2 AND A5.3
5. For details 3/A5.2, 1/A5.3, 4/A5.3 and 3/A5.3 and associated room spaces:
a. For all spaces that have a framed ceiling and a deck, please post signage that this area is not to be used for storage of any kind.
b. If storage is to be allowed above these spaces, please provide structural calculations as to the maximum load allowed and post signage to that effect.
END OF REVIEW
03/30/2012 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T12CM01293
601 W 22nd ST
New Building "Restaurant Depot"

Electrical plans denied for following, address each item and indicate how addressed.
1. All submittals to to be in minimum 3/32" text, required per City of Tucson Commercial Submittal Requirements.
2. Sheet E2.1, City of Tucson requires compliance with City
of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Ord # 10963, compliance calculation must be included on this sheet,cannot be seperate. Ordinance can be found on
City of Tucson web page. Go to Planning and
Development Services,the to Building Codes.
3. Sheet E1.2 shows circuits being used for RP2-
43,45,47,and 54. The panel is only 42 circuits.
4. Provide Fault Current Calculations and insert them on Sheet E3.1,must show calculation rather than just figures.


Ray T Majuta
Elect Plan Review
PDSD, City of Tucson
3/31/12
Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov
03/30/2012 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved Building plan is approved and will restamp the set after approval of the DP12-0024 DEV PLAN PACKAGE.
04/10/2012 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied Zoning cannot approve until the site plan has been approved.
04/18/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1. RESTAURANT DEPOT
2. FRONTS 18" PUBLIC SEWER THRU ADJACENT PARCELS - NEEDS TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - NEED PCRWRD-3RD FLOOR REVIEW- CHAD AMATEAU 740-6547 - NEED PCRWRD-3RD CAPACITY EVALUATION -- KURT STEMM 740-6607
3. NEED WASTEWATER IWC TOM TOMCHAK REVIEW OF EXTERIOR 4" FS- 3035 W EL CAMINO DEL CERRO - 742-6200

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/11/2012 GERARDO BONILLA APPROVAL SHELF Completed
05/11/2012 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
05/11/2012 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed