Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM01164
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/23/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide calculations to show that the size of the overflow opening in the roof drain collector box has a drainage capacity equal to that of the scupper. Reference: Sections 1107.1 and 1107.3, IPC 2006. |
| 03/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4, 101.4.3, and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the evaporative cooling units. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. |
| 03/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/26/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | GENERAL 1. For the purpose of assessing additional plan review fees and not for any type of approval, please provide a list of intended deferred submittals on an 8.5" x 11" sheet of company stationary addressed to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose. This made be email directly to him, Ron.Boose@tucsonaz.gov. 2. There are several sheets thought this submittal that have lettering sizes below the COT standard of 3/32" (actual size) upper and lower case. Please revise all such lettering and resubmit. 3. Please provide special inspection certifications as listed on sheet S1.1. SHEET A2.01 4. Details "A" and "B" are not indicative of the actual wall conditions shown on A10 Floor Plan. Please revise and provide accurate wall section depiction of the actual design conditions and parameters. 5. At detail A10, referenced details A7.1/A10 and A14 do not exist because there is no sheet A7.1. SHEET A2.02 6. Please provide structural calculations for the roof mounted evaporative coolers mounted on the existing building roof. SHEET A2.02 AND A2.02 7. Please provide a toilet room as per the 2006 IBC, Section 2902.4 on the floor plans. 8. If storage atop the roof of the office is intended, please post signage to that effect and the maximum allowable weight permitted. If storage is not allowed atop the office, please post signage to that effect that storage of any kind, is not allowed. SHEET S2.1 AND S3.2 AND STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS 9. There are no structural calculations for detail 102. END OF REVIEW. |
| 03/27/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 03/28/2012 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Please lighten background of lighting and power plan for better clarity of electrical design. Lighting plan in particular is difficult to read. 2) Please provide panel schedule for PL6 showing existing and new loads. |
| 04/10/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning cannot approve until an approved site plan is provided. |
| 04/10/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/12/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |