Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM01079
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/14/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Chicago Store - 5646 E. Speedway Blvd. T12CM01079 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 14, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Show the future right-of-way (ROW) and future curb on the site plan. 3. Provide a street perimeter yard setback on the plan based on LUC 3.2.6.5.B 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 03/14/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/14/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/14/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. GENERAL: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. 2. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN/REFLECTED CEILING PLAN: DETAIL 6/A1 IS CUT ON BOTH OF THESE PLANS, BUT IS INCORRECT. REVISE. 3. SHEET A1; DETAIL 5: PROVIDE THE WALL BRACING SIZE, SPACING, AND CONNECTION TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE AND TO THE TOP OF THE PARTITION. INDICATE THE CONNECTION OF 2X4 WOD STUDS TO THE ROOF STRUCTURE. 4. SHEET A1; DETAIL 5: FOR THE ALTERNATE METHOD OF SUPPORT, PROVIDE THE CONNECTION OF THE WALL TO THE 2X4 WOOD STUDS AND THE CONNECTION OF THE 2X4 WOOD STUDS TO THE ROOF STRUCTURE. 5. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: DETAILS 8/A2 AND 9/A2 ARE CUT ON THE PLAN, BUT ARE INCORRECT. REVISE. 6. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: DOES THE CORRIDOR REQUIRE A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING PER THE IBC 1017.1? VERIFY. 7. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND MOP SINK ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN. PROVIDE. 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 03/14/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 03/15/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/15/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/15/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/15/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/15/2012 | RSHERRY1 | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | No new plumbing fixtures. |
| 03/15/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |