Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM00886
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET A1.0 1. OK 2. Please provide structural calculations for all new roof top mounted HVAC equipment. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: Non-responsive, structural calculations not included SHEET S1.0 3. OK 4. OK 5. There is an extra footing and column shown just South of footing F-8 in the calculations, that is not shown on the foundation plan. Please explain. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: Non-responsive, extra footing still shown in calculations. SHEET S2.0 6. Please coordinate the beam layout at the front of the strore front shown on the roof framing plan to that as deplicted on sheet 4 of the calculations. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: Non-responsive, structural framing has not been corrected. SHEET S1.1 7. Please provide special inspection certifications for bolts on concrete and foundation inspection. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: Non-responsive, certifications not included in resubmittal however they may be presented at permit accquisition. SHEET E1.0 8. Please provide structural calculations for the light pole foundations. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS: Non-responsive, structural calculations not included END OF REVIEW |
| 05/16/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Provide a legible and complete copy of the Arizona architect's seal on each drawing. |
| 05/16/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 05/16/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Provide a legible and complete copy of the Arizona architect's seal on each drawing. 2. Comment not addressed. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4, 101.4.3, and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 3. Comment not resolved; the common condensate pipe serving HP-5, HP-6, and HP-7 (a total of 30 tons) shall be a minimum of 1-1/4" in size. [Original comment: Revise the size of the condensate drains shown on the mechanical plan and in detail 3/M1.0 per Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 814.0, UPC 2006.] |
| 05/30/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 502 W. Ajo Retail Center T12CM00886 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 30, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved by all PDSD agencies. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |