Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM00886
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/13/2012 | KBROUIL1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/22/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 502 W. Ajo Retail Center T12CM00886 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 22, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 03/22/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET A1.0 1. The accessible parking layout does not match that shown on the site development plans. Please reconcile. SHEET A5.0 2. Please provide structural calculations for all new roof top mounted HVAC equipment. SHEET S1.0 3. Detail 1/S1.1 shows 3#4s, calcs call for 3#5s. Please reconcile. 4. For all the new isolated footings shown below the existing slabs: a. Show area of existing slab demolition b. Show and provide specifications for concrete slab fill and patching. 5. There is an extra footing and column shown just South of footing F-8 in the calculations, that is not shown on the foundation plan. Please explain. SHEET S2.0 6. Please coordinate the beam layout at the front of the strore front shown on the roof framing plan to that as deplicted on sheet 4 of the calculations. SHEET S1.1 7. Please provide special inspection certifications for bolts on concrete and foundation inspection. SHEET E1.0 8. Please provide structural calculations for the light pole founfations. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/23/2012 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | plan ck. Dan Santa Cruz |
| 03/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The applicable code for commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments, not the 2003 UPC with State Of Arizona amendments as shown in the plumbing general notes. 2. Provide a legible and complete copy of the Arizona architect's seal on each drawing. 3. Clarify the work that is to be done as part of this activity (i.e. not "future"). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer along with the location of its connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 5. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. |
| 03/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a legible and complete copy of the Arizona architect's seal on each drawing. 2. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4, 101.4.3, and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 3. Revise the size of the condensate drains shown on the mechanical plan and in detail 3/M1.0 per Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. |
| 03/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Provide the total connected water demand that will result from the addition of this activity (including the identified "future" fixtures). Reference: Sections 610.1 and 610.2, UPC 2006. |
| 04/04/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/10/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Engineering can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/26/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |