Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T12CM00630
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/27/2012 | KBROUIL1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/08/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET G1.0; BUILDING CODE DATA: RATHER THAN "LATEST EDITION" FOR THE ANSI A117.1 CODE, INDICATE THE 2003 EDITION. 2. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN LEGEND: THE FOURTH SYMBOL INDICATES TO SEE SHEET A1.1 FOR ARCHITECTURAL KEY NOTES. REVISE. 3. SHEET A1.0; ARCHITECTURAL PLAN KEY NOTES: KEY NOTE A3 SHOULD BE INDICATED AT THE MANAGER'S OFFICE (PER SECTION 8/A6.0 CUT AT THE OFFICE WEST WALL). VERIFY. 4. SHEET A1.0; ARCHITECTURAL PLAN KEY NOTES: KEY NOTE A7 INDICATES TO SEE DETAIL 2/A6.2. REVISE. 5. SHEET A4.0; DIMENSIONS: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE DIMENSIONS TO MEET THIS STANDARD. 6. SHEET A5.0; DETAILS 5 AND 12: PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE KICKER CONNECTION AT THE ROOF. INCLUDE CONNECTOR SIZE AND QUANTITY AT THE TOP OF THE PARTITION WALL AND AT THE ROOF. 7. SHEET A5.0; DETAIL 1: A NOTE AT THE TOP OF THE WALL INDICATES TO CONNECT TO THE DECK ABOVE, BUT THE WALL STOPS AT THE BOTTOM OF A ROOF TRUSS. CLARIFY AND INDICATE CONNECTORS. 8. SHEET A5.0; DETAILS 2, 6, AND 14: A NOTE AT THE TOP OF THE WALL SHOULD INDICATE TO ATTACH TO THE DECK ABOVE (PER DETAIL 3). VERIFY AND INDICATE CONNECTORS. 9. SHEET A5.0; DETAIL 3: INDICATE THE CONNECTOR SIZE AND SPACING AT THE TOP OF THE PARTITION WALL. 10. SHEET A5.0; DETAIL 15: A NOTE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE WALL INDICATES TO ANCHOR TO THE C.M.U. PROVIDE ANCHOR SIZE AND SPACING. 11. SHEET S0.0; BASIS FOR DESIGN: THE CITY OF TUCSON USES THE 2006 I.B.C. REVISE NOTE. 12. SHEET S0.0; BASIS FOR DESIGN: THERE IS NO SNOW LOAD REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CITY OF TUCSON. REVISE NOTE. 13. SHEET S0.0: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS INDICATING THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE CAN SUPPORT THE NEW MECHANICAL LOADS, OR PROVIDE A NOTE ON THIS SHEET INDICATING AN ANALYSIS HAS BEEN COMPLETED ON THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE FOR THE NEW MECHANICAL LOADS AND THE EXISTING STRUCTURE IS APPROVED AS SHOWN. 14. SHEET S1.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE SECTION CUTS THROUGH THE NEW MECHANICAL UNITS TO MEET THIS STANDARD. 15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 03/13/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 2. Clarify the natural gas input for HL-14 and HL-15; it is shown as 360 MBH each on sheet MPE2.0 and 65 MBH each on sheet M3.0. 3. Condensate drains may not terminate at or over a plumbing vent. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Revise the size of the condensate drain piping per Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. (Note that Lennox units typically have at least a 1" condensate drain outlet which will correspond to detail 8/M2.0.) |
| 03/13/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/14/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 2. A water heater with a 4-gallon storage capacity in a closed water system requires a means for controlling thermal expansion. Provide a detail for the installation of water heater WH-2, including the temperature and pressure relief, thermal expansion control device, and valves. Reference: Sections 502.1, 503.1, 504, and 607.3 IPC 2006. 3. Show where the temperature and pressure relief discharge pipe for WH-2 will terminate. Reference: Section 504.6, IPC 2006. 4. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 416.5, IPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. |
| 03/21/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/21/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning will approve the plan once all commercial reviewers have approved the plan. |
| 03/21/2012 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. (Upper and lower case). 2. Please provide arc fault calculations to justify equipment ratings. 3. Please justify/provide IECC lighting compliance certificate or information. When I calculate lighting per 2006 IECC table 505.5.2 note 'a' I arrive at an allowed lighting power of 73,428 watts; lower than your stated connected wattage. 4. Please provide written responses to correction comments upon next submittal. LeeRay.Hanly@tucsonaz.gov |