Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM00542
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2012 | KBROUIL1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/05/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A-0; BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS: INCLUDE VERBIAGE CONCERNING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS. 2. SHEET A-0; BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS: A NOTE INDICATES THE EXIT SEPARATION PROVIDED IS 112 FEET. VERIFY. 3. SHEET A-0; BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS: A NOTE INDICATES **MAXIMUM OVERALL DIAGONAL DISTANCE. PROVIDE THAT DISTANCE. 4. SHEET A-0; BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS: A NOTE INDICATES A MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE OF 200 FEET IF THE BUILDING IS SPRINKLERED. THE DISTANCE IS 250 FEET (IBC TABLE 1016.1). CLARIFY. 5. SHEET A-0; BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS: A NOTE INDICATES A DEAD END CORRIDOR LENGTH OF 15 FEET. WHERE IS THE DEAD END CORRIDOR? 6. SHEET A-0; BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS: THE EXIT SEPARATION INDICATES 120 FEET FOR A DIAGONAL LENGTH. VERIFY. 7. SHEET A-0; BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS: INDICATE ALL CODES USED FOR THIS PROJECT. 8. SHEET A-0; INDEX: SHEET SN2 IS INDICATED BUT NOT IN THE SET. CLARIFY. 9. SHEET A-0; INDEX: SHEETS S1.1 AND S3 ARE NOT IN THE INDEX, BUT ARE IN THE SET. CLARIFY. 10. SHEET A-1; FLOOR PLAN: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN. 11. SHEET A-1; FLOOR PLAN: PLAN NOTES INDICATE "FIRE SPRINKLER RISER WHERE REQUIRED BY CODE" AND "SPRINKLER SYSTEM DRAIN IF REQUIRED" AND "INSPECTOR'S TEST VALVE IF REQUIRED". ARE THESE ITEMS REQUIRED OR NOT? VERIFY AND REVISE DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED. 12. SHEET A-1; FLOOR PLAN: INDICATE EXITING ROUTES ON THE PLAN, INCLUDING DISTANCE TO EXITS. 13. SHEET A-1; FLOOR PLAN AND DOOR SCHEDULE: DOORS G AND H INDICATE TO "SEE MANUFACTURER'S SHOP DRAWINGS". INDICATE ADA/EXIT HARDWARE IN THE SCHEDULE. 14. SHEET A-1 (FLOOR PLAN); DETAIL 6: THE SECTION CUT THROUGH THE METAL HOOD SHOULD INDICATE "7", NOT "A". VERIFY. 15. SHEET A-1 (FLOOR PLAN); DETAIL 8: THIS DETAIL INDICATES A METAL STUD WALL. CLARIFY. 16. SHEET A-1 (FLOOR PLAN); DETAIL 7: HOW IS THE 1/8" BENT PLATE ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING FRAME? ADD A NOTE OR A DETAIL. 17. SHEET A-1; DETAIL 8A: WHAT IS THE ANCHOR SIZE AND EMBEDMENT AT THE 1/8" BENT PLATE? CLARIFY. 18. SHEET A-2; KEY NOTES: MAKE NOTE 15 LEGIBLE. 19. SHEET A-2; RIGHT SIDE WALL: A NOTE 12 IS INDICATED ON THE ELEVATION, BUT NO SIGN IS SHOWN. CLARIFY. 20. SHEET A-6; DETAIL 6: WHAT IS THE HANDRAIL ATTACHED TO? PROVIDE DETAILS. 21. SHEET A-6; ROOF PLAN: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN. 22. SHEET S0 (SEISMIC LOADS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY C, WHILE THE PLANS INDICATE CATEGORY B. CLARIFY. 23. SHEET S1; FOUNDATION PLAN: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN. 24. SHEET S2; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: AT THE CANOPY, DESIGNATE THE JOIST SIZE ON THE PLAN THAT IS LOCATED ON THE COLUMN CENTERLINE. 25. SHEET S2 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET A-1 (FLOOR PLAN): THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN INDICATES A 6'-0" OPENING IN THE REAR WALL, WHILE THE STRUCTURAL PLAN DOES NOT. SHOW THE OPENING AND LINTEL. 26. SHEET S2 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET A-1 (FLOOR PLAN): INDICATE ALL DOOR OPENINGS ON THE STRUCTURAL PER THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN AND PROVIDE A LINTEL. 27. SHEET S2; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN. 28. GENERAL: PROVIDE A FULL SIZE SITE PLAN WITH THE INFORMATION REQUIRED PER IBC SECTION 106.2. 29. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. 30. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 03/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. The specified lavatory faucets are designed for a flow rate of 2.2 GPM. According to ARS Title 45, Chapter 1, Article 12, 45-313, the maximum flow rate for lavatory faucets shall be no more than an average of one-half gallon of water per minute at a pressure of eighty PSI or they shall be equipped with a mechanism that causes the faucet to close automatically after delivering no more than one-fourth gallon of water. 3. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. 4. Provide backflow protection for the freeze-proof yard hydrant located at grade and provide signage for the hydrant to indicate that the water is non-potable. Reference: Sections 601.2 and 602.3, UPC 2006. 5. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, vacuum relief, and valves. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, 608.3, and 608.7 UPC 2006. 6. Provide for sterilization of the domestic water piping per Section 609.9, UPC 2006. 7. Provide end of run cleanout at mop sink and WC-1. Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 8. Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006 (see the 4" horizontal drain downstream of the two lavatories; if the size of the floor cleanout is 4", this will eliminate the problem). 9. Revise the size of the primary and overflow scuppers to comply with the requirements of Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006. Refer also to Section 1106.4, UPC 2006. |
| 03/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Revise the ventilation calculations to include ventilation for storage areas and the restrooms. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Ventilation for restrooms in public spaces requires a minimum of 75 CFM of mechanical exhaust per water closet or urinal. Reference: Table 403.3, IMC 2006. |
| 03/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a copy of the site utility plan showing the location of the water meter and indicate the size of the meter. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Provide a copy of the site utility plan showing the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly and indicate the size of the assembly. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code. http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf 3. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf |
| 03/13/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: AutoZone Store #4098 T12CM00542 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 13, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. 3. The address shown in the title block is not correct. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 03/15/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM00542 675 W Valencia Auto Zone Remodel 1. Provide 2006 IECC Lighting Budget Calculations, ComCheck ok. 2. Provide 2006 City of Tucson Ord # 10135, Outdoor Lighting Ordinance Compliance Calculations. Both required by City of Tucson Submittal Requirements. Ray T Majuta Elect Pln Ck PDSD, C of Tucson 3/19/12 Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/20/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. AUTO ZONE 2. NEED TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER 3. NEED TO SHOW DEMO/REMOVAL OF ANY BUILDING/PLUMBING FIXTURES FOR CREDIT PRIOR TO PAYMENT IF APPLICABLE 4. NEED WASTEWATER 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION FOR ANY WASTEWATER PLUMBING FIXTURE REMOVED IF APPLICABLE 740-6602 OR 740-6606 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/21/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |