Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T12CM00380
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | All of previous review comments have been corrected and approved with the exception of Comment 3, concerning the Occupancy use. Please reference the new comments below for explanation. NEW REVIEW COMMENTS SHEET G-1 1. Occupancy Use Classification "B" for this project is questionable until an accurate occupancy load has been recalculated and confirmed. 2. The seating design for both assembly lecture rooms does not comply with what the 2006 IBC defines as fixed seating. At best the large lecture are has fixed counter top with loose seating and can not be considered fixed seating. The smaller lecture room most definitely has table and chairs for seating. Both areas need to be refined as assembly with table and chair seating or as defined by Table 1104.1.1, one person per every 15 s.f. The stage area would also be calculated at 1/15. A rough occupancy load calculation for the larger room is approximately 106 and 81 for the smaller lecture room. a. Please provide an accurate occupancy load calculation based on the above premise and if a lesser load is desired, please file an appeal with the building official justifying the lesser occupancy count. 3. With occupancy load estimated in comment 2 above, several changes in this project must be made for code compliance: a. Change of occupancy use from "B" to "A-3", Lecture Halls. b. Provide two exits separated as per Section 1015.2.1.2. From both rooms. c. Recalculate the toilet fixtures required for the new occupancy load. 4. Provide accessible seating as required per section 1108.2 and identify on the floor plan. 5. The large lecture hall and its stage are not accessible. Please reconcile. 6. Insure all check in and prep counters are accessible. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/25/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed; the scupper dimensions as shown in detail 26/A8 are too small and no secondary roof drainage has been provided. [Original comment: Provide calculations to show that the roof scuppers are adequate to protect the roof from the rain load. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1107, IPC 2006, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2006.] |
| 04/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not resolved; revise the site plan to show the route of the water service to the building. [Original comment: Show the location of the water meter, reduced pressure backflow preventer, and the route of the water service line on the site plan. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.] |
| 05/10/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |