Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T12CM00380
Parcel: 135074470

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T12CM00380
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/29/2012 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET C1; INDEX OF DRAWINGS: LISTED IN THE INDEX ON SHEET C1 IS A SITE PLAN. REVISE INDEX.
2. SHEET C1; CODES APPLICABLE: ADD THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 CODE TO THIS LIST.
3. SHEET G1; CODE REVIEW: THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION LISTED IS A-3 (TRAINING). SECTION 304 OF THE IBC INDICATES "TRAINING AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT NOT WITHIN A SCHOOL OR ACADEMIC PROGRAM" FALLS UNDER THE B OCCUPANCY. VERIFY.
4. SHEET DP2; SITE PLAN: THE BUILDING SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN INDICATES TWO STORY. CLARIFY.
5. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE ELEVATION REFERENCES, DOOR REFERENCES, AND SECTION CUTS.
6. SHEET A2; FLOOR PLAN: IN THE MEN'S RESTROOM, THE ACCESSIBLE URINAL PARTITION EXCEEDS 24" IN LENGTH, THEREFORE THE STALL WIDTH MUST MEET ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 305.7 REQUIREMENTS. DETAIL 3/A6 DOES NOT MEET THAT REQUIREMENT. VERIFY.
7. SHEET A5; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 17 AND 18 WERE NOT FOUND ON THE SECTIONS. VERIFY.
8. SHEET A6; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 15, 19, 22, AND 23 WERE NOT FOUND ON THE SECTION. VERIFY.
9. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES: IS THE 4" CONCRETE SLAB (NOTE 2) REINFORCED? VERIFY.
10. SHEET S3.0 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 5): INDICATE ON THE FRAMING PLAN A REFERENCE TO NOTE 8 AT AN INTERIOR WALL LINTEL (DLT2 IN THE CALCULATIONS).
11. SHEET S3.0 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 5): INDICATE ON THE FRAMING PLAN A REFERENCE TO NOTE 8 AT AN EXTERIOR WALL LINTEL (DLT3 IN THE CALCULATIONS).
12. SHEET S3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: WHAT DO THE SHADED AREAS INDICATE? PROVIDE.
13. SHEET S4.0; DETAILS 402, 403, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, AND 415: INDICATE THE 1'-6" MINIMUM DEPTH FROM FINISH GRADE/FINISH FLOOR TO THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING.
14. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV.
15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
03/01/2012 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
03/12/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Show how the fan coils are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected (the structural drawings appear to show the fan coils as being located on top of the roof structure). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
3. Indicate the size of the section of the condensate drain between FC-4 and the intersection with the condensate drain from FC-1 and FC-2. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
03/12/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Show the location of the water meter, reduced pressure backflow preventer, and the route of the water service line on the site plan. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
03/12/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Coordinate the directional orientation of the building with the architect and the civil drawings.
2. Coordinate the location of the junction of the building drain and the building sewer with the civil site drawing.
3. Provide a cleanout at the junction of the building drain and the building sewer. Reference: Section 708.3.5, IPC 2006.
4. Provide calculations to show that the roof scuppers are adequate to protect the roof from the rain load. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1107, IPC 2006, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2006.
03/19/2012 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
03/20/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1. RELIASOFT TRAINING CENTER D11-0034 BLDG #2
2. CONNECTING TO ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER #PV-2005-017 PER PERMIT #PT05S06185
3. NEED TO CARIFY LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PRIVATE SEWER - DP SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH BLDG PLUMB PLAN

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/16/2012 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed