Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM00376
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/16/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/22/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM00376 2711 S Houghton New Walmart 1. Provide 2006 IECC LIghting Budget Calculations,Com Ck ok, request to see calculations. 2. 2005 NEC 110.26.(C).2. rooms with electrical equipment rated 1200 amps or more are required to have doors open in the direction of egress and be equipped with panic bars,pressure plates or other devices that open under simple pressure. Please indicate this on Sheet E2.3. Ray T Majuta Elect Pln Review PSDS C of Tuc 2/21/2012 Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/23/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | GENERAL 1. Please provide a copy of the approved site developement plan. 2. Please provide special inspection certification. 3. A separate permit application must be submitted for the facility racking. 4. A separate permit for the fire sprinkler system must be submitted to the Fire Department. 5. Please provide the health department review activity number. STRUCTURAL 6. Please include in the structural calculations a key plan for both the roof framing and foundation plans. END OF REVIEW |
| 02/23/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 02/27/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/27/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/27/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning cannot approve the building plan until the development plan has been approved. |
| 02/28/2012 | GBONILL1 | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. WALMART 2. NEED TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - MAY NEED TO PERMIT ON SITE PRIVATE SEWER WITH DEQ REVIEW & APPROVAL IF OVER 3000GALLONS/DAY FOR SITE WITH MULTIPLE BUILDINGS 3. NEED PCRWRD/3RD FLOOR/CHAD AMATEAU REVIEW OF LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER 740-6547 4. NEED PCRWRD/3RD FLOOR/CAPACITY RESPONSE KURT STEMM 740-6534 5. NEED WW/IWC/TOM TOMCHAK REVIEW OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR 3035 W EL CAMINO DEL CERRO 724-6200 |
| 02/29/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the size of the condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. Show all the pipe sizes on the drawing. 2. Condensate drains may not decrease in size in the direction of flow. Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2006. 3. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fan EF-3 so that all of the air supplied to the restroom will be exhausted (i.e. exhaust the supply air even when the light is off). Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006. 4. Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson allows the use of the ASHRAE 62-1-2004 (not 2007) ventilation calculation procedure provided that the default occupant densities and combined outdoor air rates are used. If the occupancy rates are to be based on statistical data per the exception to Section 403.3, IMC 2006, submit the statistical data for review. 5. Revise the size of the grease ducts to provide a minimum velocity of 1500 feet per minute. Reference: Section 506.3.4, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 6. Justify the use of a Type II hood over a gas-fired oven. Reference: Section 507.2.1, IMC 2006. 7. Show that the hood installations comply with Section 507.9, IMC 2006 for clearances (i.e. wall construction). |
| 02/29/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Verify the natural gas pipe sizing calculations. Based on the node-to-node pressure drops shown in the calculations, the total pressure drop from the meter to the water heater, WHG1, will result in inadequate pressure to operate the water heater (< 0.002"wc). Reference: Section 401.8, IFGC 2006. 2. Provide a design for the water heater mounting shelves located above the service sinks along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 301.2, IPC 2006. 3. Show that the storage-type water heaters located above any fixture outlets have been provided with an approved anti-siphon device (e.g. vacuum relief valve). Reference: Section 504.1, IPC 2006. 4. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sinks, with indirect connections for the sanitizing compartments only. Reference: Section 802.1, IPC 2006. 5. Siphonic roof drainage is an engineered system that requires the submission of an Appeal to the Building Official under Section 301.2, UPC 2006, Alternate Materials and Methods of Construction Equivalency. Appeals to the building official are reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Submit the calculations, upon which the design is based, for review by the Building Official. Include in the calculations the structural requirements for the effect of the roof ponding. 6. Clarify the use of the RD-1 roof drains as overflow roof drains instead of overflow roof drains, RD-2, (sheet P1). |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/09/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |