Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM00335
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/09/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Occupant load shown on sheet CS indicates fire alarm system would be required. Please refer to 2006 IFC, section 907. |
| 02/10/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET CS; PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT: THE TABLE FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF FIXTURES INDICATES 7 DRINKING FOUNTAINS ARE REQUIRED, AND THREE ARE PROVIDED. REFRIGERATORS WITH BOTTLED WATER ARE NOT CONSIDERED ACCESSIBLE DRINKING FOUNTAINS. HIGH/LOW DRINKING FOUNTAINS OR SINGLE POINT-OF-USE WATER DISPENSERS MAY BE USED. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET AS2.00; DETAIL 18: A DETAIL NOTE INDICATES "HANDRAIL OR GUARDRAIL WHERE OCCURS". ARE THERE ANY GUARDRAILS? ALL RAILS SHOWN INDICATE 2'-10" HEIGHT. IF THERE ARE ANY GUARDRAILS, THEY NEED TO BE DETAILED PER THE IBC SECTION 1013. 3. SHEET AS2.00; DETAIL 8: ARE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PROVIDED FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATIONS? VERIFY AND PROVIDE AS REQUIRED. 4. SHEET A1.00; SECOND FLOOR RESTROOMS AT SERVICE TECH: AN ENLARGED PLAN IS REFERENCED AS 9/A5.0. REVISE. 5. SHEET A1.01; WALL TYPE LEGEND: TWO WALLS INDICATE TO "SEE PLAN FOR TOP OF WALL HEIGHTS". WHERE IS THAT LOCATED? VERIFY. 6. SHEET A10.02; DETAILS 13 AND 18: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 7. SHEETS A11.00 THROUGH A11.03: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 8. SHEET S1.01; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 9. SHEET S2.01; FOUNDATION PLAN: DETAIL 253/S5.03 CUT ON GRID L.0 SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE FOUNDATION PLAN. VERIFY. 10. SHEET S2.02; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: BEAM RB2 WAS NOT FOUND ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 11. SHEET S2.02 (ROOF BEAM SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET R53): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE BEAM RB23 IS A 5 1/8" X 13 1/2" GLB, WHILE THE BEAM SCHEDULE INDICATES A 5 1/8" X 13" GLB. REVISE. 12. SHEET S2.02; FRAMING PLAN: A BEAM ON GRID L.0 BETWEEN GRIDS 19.0 AND 20.0 IS NOT MARKED. PROVIDE. IS THE NORTH END OF THAT BEAM SUPPORTED BY A STEEL COLUMN (PER DETAIL 253/S5.03)? CLARIFY. 13. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the Mechanical Energy Compliance calculations using the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet (zone 2b). 2. The kitchen design (M1.01) is noted on sheet CS as being for "Reference Only", with a separate review and permit. If the kitchen is to be under a separate permit, clarify that intent on the drawing and identify how much of the mechanical work will be done in the area for the kitchen. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 3. Revise the size of the condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Smoke detectors shall be located in the return duct system, upstream of any filters or outside air connections (see keynote 1, M1.01, which is in conflict with note C, Code Information, on sheet M0.01). Reference: Section 606.2.1, IMC 2006. |
| 02/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the plumbing code to be used for this activity. The Code Information note on sheet P0.01 refers to the 2006 UPC but the Applicable Code note on sheet CS refers to the 2006 IPC. This review has been made using the 2006 UPC. 2. Provide a low-pressure cutoff and a pressure gauge for the booster pump as required per Section 609.8, UPC 2006. 3. The kitchen design (P1.05) is noted on sheet CS as being for "Reference Only", with a separate review and permit. If the kitchen is to be under a separate permit, clarify that intent on the drawing and identify how much of the plumbing work will be done in the area for the kitchen.. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 03/02/2012 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1.Plan sheet E2.01. Provide new paint booth location ,details of all electrical devices, lighting, fans,interlocks, associated wiring, schematic or wiring diagram,classification per nec. If permitted and work by others , please indicate. 2.Plan sheet e2.01 Please indcate use and or purpose of portable 312 KVA generator ? |
| 03/06/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: O'Rielly Chevrolet - New Used Car Sales Building & Remodel T12CM00333, T12CM00334, T12CM00335, Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. 7. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 03/06/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/13/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION |