Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM00334
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/09/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Occupant load shown on sheet CS indicates fire alarm system would be required. Please refer to 2006 IFC, section 907. |
| 02/10/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET CS; PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT: THE TABLE FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF FIXTURES INDICATES 7 DRINKING FOUNTAINS ARE REQUIRED, AND THREE ARE PROVIDED. REFRIGERATORS WITH BOTTLED WATER ARE NOT CONSIDERED ACCESSIBLE DRINKING FOUNTAINS. HIGH/LOW DRINKING FOUNTAINS OR SINGLE POINT-OF-USE WATER DISPENSERS MAY BE USED. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET A1.03; KEYNOTES: THE FIRST FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTE 201 INDICATES TO SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE PLUMBING FIXTURE. COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS AS NO FIXTURE IDENTIFICATION WAS FOUND. 3. SHEET A1.03 (SECOND FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A8.00 (SECTION 5): 5/A8.00 ON SHEET A1.03 INDICATES AN ENLARGED PLAN, WHILE 5 ON A8.00 IS A SECTION CUT. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET A3.00; ROOF PLAN: THE SOUTH WALL INDICATES A SECTION CUT 25/A10.00. REVISE (NO SECTION 25/A10.00). 5. SHEET A5.01; ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS: PROVIDE DIMENSIONED ELEVATIONS OF GRAB BAR AND PAPER DISPENSER PER ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURES 604.5.1, 604.5.2, AND 604.7. 6. SHEET A5.01; ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS: PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE WATER CLOSET, SINK, AND URINAL HEIGHTS PER THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 FIGURES 604.4, 605.2, AND 606.3. 7. SHEET A7.01; SECTION 1: THE LOWER AWNING INDICATES THE SUPPORT ROD EXTENDS ABOVE THE WINDOW SILL, WHILE ELEVATION 2/A4.00 INDICATES THE SUPPORT ROD PLATE EXTENDS NO HIGHER THAN THE BOTTOM OF THE WINDOW. CLARIFY. 8. SHEET A8.00; STAIR PLAN 4: STAIR PLAN 4 ON SHEET A8.00 INDICATES FIRST FLOOR PLAN AT STAIR 2. REVISE TO SECOND FLOOR PLAN. 9. SHEET A8.00; STAIR PLAN 3: STAIR PLAN 3 ON SHEET A8.00 IS REFERENCED AS 4/A8.00 ON SHEET A1.03. VERIFY AND REVISE. 10. SHEET A8.00; STAIR PLANS 1 AND 2: SECTIONS 5 AND 5A SHOULD BE REVERSED. VERIFY AND REVISE. 11. SHEET A8.00; STAIR SECTION 6: THE LEFT STAIR INDICATES A STAIR DETAIL 14/AS2.00. REVISE (NO DETAIL 14/AS2.00). 12. SHEET A10.02; DETAIL 1: PROVIDE DETAILS OF HOW THE DIAGONAL BRACING CONNECTS TO THE JOISTS (PERPENDICULAR AND PARALLEL) ABOVE. 13. SHEET 10.02; DETAILS 13 AND 18: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 14. SHEETS A11.00 THROUGH A11.03: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 15. SHEET S1.01; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 16. SHEET S1.01; DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. 17. SHEET S2.03; SECOND FLOOR FRAMING: AT THE WEST STAIR, MASONRY LINTEL BEAM (ML1) IS MISSING. VERIFY. 18. SHEET S2.03 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 8): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE C1 HAS A 4'-6" X 4'-6" X 1'-0" FOOTING, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A 3'-0" X 3'-0" X 1'-0" FOOTING (F3). CLARIFY. 19. SHEET S2.03 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE FOOTINGS AT GRIDS A AND F ON GRID 2, OR PROVIDE REFERENCE WHERE THESE CALCULATIONS ARE LOCATED. 20. SHEET S2.03 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE MW-8): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE TO USE 1-#5 VERTICAL IN EACH CELL FOR 8 CELLS BELOW FLOOR BEAMS, WHILE THE PLAN (NOTE A) INDICATES 2-#5 VERTICALS IN EACH CELL FOR 3 CELLS BELOW FLOOR BEAMS. CLARIFY. 21. SHEET S2.03 (SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.01 (DETAIL 206): THE DETAIL CUT 206/S5.01 AT THE EAST STAIR IS CUT AT A COLUMN. INCLUDE THE COLUMN IN THE DETAIL, OR REVISE THE DETAIL NUMBER. 22. SHEET S4.01; DETAILS 102 AND 115: THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (SHEET 9) INDICATES FOOTINGS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 18" BELOW FINISH GRADE. THESE TWO DETAILS DO NOT MEET THAT REQUIREMENT. CLARIFY. 23. SHEET S5.01; DETAIL 209: NOTE 3 INDICATES METAL STUD BRACES AT 32" O.C., BUT ARE SHOWN AT 16" O.C. CLARIFY. 24. SHEET S5.02; DETAIL 224: REVISE THE DETAIL TITLE. THIS IS NOT AT JOIST BEARING. 25. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Verify that the second floor restrooms are correctly labeled. 2. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006. 3. Show that the floors of the restrooms with floor drains slope toward the floor drains. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006. 4. Revise the water schematic to show the hot water for SK-1 on the second floor is connected to the left side of the faucet. Reference: Section 601.3, UPC 2006. 5. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 fps for the copper piping (5 fps for the hot water), not 10 fps as noted on the water pipe size calculation. Reference: Section A 6.1, UPC 2006; IAPMO IS 3-2000, and Section 610.0, UPC 2006. 6. The 2-way cleanout shown in Detail 5/P3.00 is in violation of Section 707.6, UPC 2006. 7. Revise the roof gutter and downspout sizing (shown on sheet A3.00) based on a storm of 60-minutes duration and a 100-year return period, i.e. 3" per hour. Use the entire roof area when doing the calculations. Reference: Sections 1106.1 1106.3 and Table 11-3, UPC 2006. |
| 02/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the Mechanical Energy Compliance calculations using the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet (zone 2b). 2. Revise the size of the condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Smoke detectors shall be located in the return duct system, upstream of any filters or outside air connections (see keynote 1, M1.02, which is in conflict with note C, Code Information, on sheet M0.01). Reference: Section 606.2.1, IMC 2006. 4. Clarify keynote 13; what is a "gap connection"? Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. |
| 03/02/2012 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | See comments for T12CM 00335 |
| 03/06/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: O'Rielly Chevrolet - New Used Car Sales Building & Remodel T12CM00333, T12CM00334, T12CM00335, Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. 7. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 03/06/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Development Package and FUP must be approved before this plan is approved. |
| 09/13/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/13/2012 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |