Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T12CM00301
Parcel: 21134016C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T12CM00301
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/08/2012 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SHEET 17
1. At details "A" and "B":
a. As per the 2006 IBC, Section 1009.6, the maximum stair height without a landing is 12'-0" a.f.f.
b. As per the 2006 IBC, Section 1009.3, stair risers are limited to 7" high maximum and 4" high minimum. Treads are 11" deep minimum.
c. Please provide structural calculations as to the structural requirements of the 2006 IBC, section 1607.7 for the schedule 80 vinyl plastic handrails and posts.
d. Please show all handrail dimensions and sizes to show compliance with the 2006 IBC, Sections 1012 and 1013.
SHEET 22
2. Details 1 and 2:
a. Show all riser and tread dimensions to comply with Section 1009.3.
b. Show all handrail dimensions to comply with section 1012 and 1013.
c. At Detail 1, please show on floor plan, provide all required dimensions, show handrails and handrail elevation. Show compliance with code sections 1012, 1013 and 1009.3.
SHEET 12
3. At detail 1 show all of stairs on both sides of landing.
4. At Reservoir Roof Framing Plan, show the concrete steps in the grad slope from the steps top the roof.
SHEET 63
5. Please provide structural calculations for the antenna and lighting pole foundations.
SHEET 23, 24 AND 25
6. For all the stair plans of the inlet, outlet and booster wells, please provide dimensions including riser and tread quantities and dimensions.
SHEET 29
7. Please insure that all stair details 1, 2, and 3 comply with code sections 1009.6, 1009.3, 1607.7, 1012 and 1013: max stair run, risers and tread sizes and handrail design.
SHEET 27
8. The reinforcing shown in detail 1 does not match that show on page 92 of the calcs.
9. Ditto comment 8, detail 2 and page 93, section "B".
END OF REVIEW
02/14/2012 CARL SCHULTZ FIRE REVIEW Approved
02/16/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Passed
02/16/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Provide a mechanical design for the proposed control building that clearly shows that the installation will comply with the requirements of Sections 307, 309, 401, and 601, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
3. Provide specifications for the two wall-mounted A/C units. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Provide ventilation for the restroom. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006.
02/17/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide plumbing plans for the new control building, including water isometrics, waste and vent isometrics, roof drainage, material specifications for pipe not covered in Division 15, and fixture specifications. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Provide a plumbing design for the installation of the lift station and the force main. (Note that the specified grinder pump and sump assembly has not been available since 2007.)
3. Specify which of the approved plumbing codes will be the basis for the design of the control building and the on-site plumbing work, the 2006 UPC or the 2006 IPC.
4. Provide a septic permit from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality.
02/28/2012 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T12CM00301
2931 S Sandario RD,PC
So. Avra Valley ForBay Reservoir & Booster Station
City of Tucson

All reference to 2005 NEC,
1. Sheet 48 of Specification Book- Div 16, does not indicate
that MCC1, MCC2 or MCC 3 are to be Service Rated as per
230.66 NEC, "identified as suitable for use as service equipment".
2. Plans do not indicate GFP of services as required per 230.95.C. Indicate that MCC units are to comply with NEC
230.95 and a written record of GFP testing to be provide to AHJ.
3.Spec Book Section 160201.60-- main breaker to have AIC rating of 65,000. The AIC at source point indicates 23,450
at service, how will this be brought down to safe levels in order to protect equipment downstream as required per NEC 110.9 and 110.10.
4. The doors at the Control Building are required to comply with NEC 110.26.(C).2. Indicate this on Sheet 48.
5. The total load on Sheet 55 is required to comply with NEC 430.24, a 125% factor needs to be applied for the highest motor for all MCC's.


Ray T Majuta
Elect Pln Review
PDSD,Cof Tuc
3/05/12
Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov
03/07/2012 SEPTIC APPROVAL WWM REVIEW Denied DEQ, PERMIT APPLIED FOR 02/14/12 P12CP00912
03/08/2012 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: March 8, 2012
TO: Peter Abraham, P.E., Tucson Water, 310 West Alameda, Tucson Arizona 85747
SUBJECT: Tucson Water Southern Avra Valley Storage And Recovery Project (SAVSARP) Forebay Resevoir and Booster Station Engineering Review
ADDRESS: 2931 S Sandario Rd (32°11'03" 111°12'58")
LOCATION: T14S, R11E, Section 27
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E.
FLOODPLAIN INFO: FIRM Panel: 040192240L (effective date 16JUN11), SFHA zone: A01
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T12CM00301

SUMMARY: PDSD Engineering Division has reviewed the plan set and recommends conditional approval. Control Building and equipment shall be elevated to a minimum of Regulatory Flood Elevations. A floodplain use permit and elevation certificates will need to be generated.

If you have any questions, call me at 837-4934.

Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/19/2012 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed