Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T12CM00168
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/27/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/27/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET C1; BUILDING CODE SUMMARY, OCCUPANCY CALCULATIONS, AND EGRESS WIDTH: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 2. SHEET C1; BUILDING CODE SUMMARY: INDICATE 2003 EDITION OF THE ICC/ANSI A117.1. 3. SHEET C1; BUILDING CODE SUMMARY: UNDER 'MIXED OCCUPANCIES', THE ACCESSORY OCCUPANCY IS LISTED AS A-2. UNDER 'BUILDING OCCUPANCIES', S1 IS LISTED. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET C1; BUILDING CODE SUMMARY: UNDER 'ALLOWABLE AREA', IT IS NOTED THAT THE BUILDING IS DESIGNED FOR UNLIMITED AREA PER IBC SECTION 507.3. THAT SECTION ALLOWS UNLIMITED AREA FOR ONE STORY GROUP M BUILDINGS OF "OTHER THAN TYPE V CONSTRUCTION". UNDER THIS CODE SUMMARY, 'TYPE CONSTRUCTION' IS LISTED AS 5B. CLARIFY. 5. SHEET LS1; OCCUPANCY CALCULATIONS: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 6. SHEET LS1; OCCUPANCY LOAD CALCULATIONS: THE EGRESS WIDTH FACTOR IS LISTED AS O.20 INCHES AT THE TOP OF THE TABLE, BUT O.15 IS LISTED IN THE CALCULATIONS. CLARIFY. 7. SHEET SP1; SITE PLAN: PROVIDE A FULL SIZE SITE PLAN THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 106.2. 8. SHEET SP2; DETAIL 23: NOTE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE DETAIL INDICATES "REF. EL. FOR BLOCK TYPE". CLARIFY. INCLUDE WALL REINFORCING. 9. SHEET SP2; DETAIL 23: PROVIDE THE LINTEL OVER THE COMPACTOR CHUTE OPENING. 10. SHEET SP2; DETAIL 6: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR FLAG POLES OVER 20 FEET IN HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE. PROVIDE. 11. SHEET SP2.1; SCREENING PLAN 7: A NOTE INDICATES TO "REF. CIVIL FOR LOCATION". WHERE IS THIS REFERENCE? CLARIFY. 12. SHEET A3.2; SECTION 2: AT THE WALL GLAZING, THERE IS A SECTION CUT 6/A3.4 (NOT THE HEAD DETAIL). IS THIS CORRECT? VERIFY. 13. SHEET A4; PLAN 2: IS THE SECTION CUT 3/A6.3 THROUGH THE ROOF HATCH CORRECT? VERIFY. 14. SHEET A4.2; DETAIL 8: IS THE JIB CRANE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL? ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. 15. SHEET A7; GENERAL NOTES AND SCHEDULE NOTES: MOVE THESE NOTES DOWN SO THEY DO NOT CONFLICT WITH THE ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE. 16. SHEET S0; GENERAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 2.2 INDICATES A SOILS REPORT WAS USED. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 17. SHEET S1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S2 (DETAIL 8): THE DETAIL INDICATES A 2'-0" WIDE FOOTING "AT END OF WALL", BUT THE PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE WHERE THAT FOOTING BEGINS. PROVIDE A DIMENSION ON THE PLAN. 18. SHEET S4; VERTICAL REINFORCING SCHEDULE 10: THE FRONT WALL AT THE VESTIBULE (MARK D) INDICATES #6 VERTICALS AT 34 INCHES O.C. IS THIS CORRECT? VERIFY. 19. SHEET S4 (WALL FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 64): THE CALCULATIONS FOR WF1 INDICATE FOOTING REINFORCEMENT, WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES NONE. CLARIFY. 20. SHEET S4.1; SCHEDULE 1: THE TITLE INDICATES JOIST GIRDER SCHEDULE, BUT THE ACTUAL SCHEDULE INDICATES ONLY JOISTS. CLARIFY. 21. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PAGES 3 THROUGH 7 INDICATE THE 2009 IBC. REVISE. 22. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGES 35 AND 36: THESE TWO PAGES SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR SHEAR WALLS ON GRID LINES D AND 6. ARE CALCULATIONS FOR THE REMAINING WALLS MISSING? VERIFY. 23. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/02/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T12CM00168 8640 E Broadway Bl Walmart, Provide 2006 IECC Lighting Budget Compliance Report, one has been provided for Exterior Lighting, need one for Interior. Com Ck ok. Sheet E2.2 Electrical Room, 2005 NEC 110.26(C)(2), requires the doors in the electrical room to open in the direction of egress and be equipped with panic bars, pressure plates, or other devices which open under simple pressure. Indicate on this sheet. Ray T Majuta Electrical Pln Review PDSD, C of Tuc 2/3/12 Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/02/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 02/06/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly on the drawings (this is not shown on the civil drawings), specify the reduced pressure backflow assembly being installed, and indicate the size of the assembly. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf 2. Coordinate the size of the domestic water service; the civil plans call for a 2" meter and a 2" water service to the building but the plumbing plans call for a 3" water service to the building. |
| 02/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a natural gas piping design for the medium pressure piping, including the pipe sizes, loads and the developed lengths of the piping. Include also the initial pressure from the natural gas meter. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IFGC 2006. 2. A note on sheet M1 calls out three future natural gas branches of 500 CFH but only one such branch is clearly identified. Clarify the locations of the remaining two future branches. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IFGC 2006. 3. Revise the size of the condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 02/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories (L11) is to be controlled. Reference: Section 504.3, IECC 2006. 2. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2006. |
| 02/08/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: T12CM00078 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 8, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan is approved has been approved. 7. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 02/16/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. WALMART 2. NEED SITE UTILITY PLANS - NEED TO SHOW LOCATION\METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - NEED COPY OF ON-SITEPRIVATE SEWER FOR BASE MAP UPDATE - NEED PCRWRD/1ST FLOOR/CHAD AMATEAU REVIEW 740-6547 3. NEED WASTEWATER PLUMB FIXTURES DEMO DRAWINGS & NEED 5TH FLOOR WASTEWATER EVALUATION FOR ALL PLUMB FIXTURES REMOVED FOR CREDIT 740-6602 OR 740-6606 4. NEED PCRWRD/3RD FLOOR CAPACITY REVIEW - KURT STEMM 740-6534 / 740-6607 5. WW/IWC OK PER TOM TOMCHAK 02/08/12 1300 GALLON GREASE INTERCEPTOR |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |