Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - OVERLAY ZONE REVIEW
Permit Number - T11SA00336
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - OVERLAY ZONE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/09/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Bella Vista Apartments Overlay Zone (2nd Review) T11SA00336 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 8, 2011 DUE DATE: November 28, 2011 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the overlay plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. Provide the date of approval for the Overlay zones in note 3. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/18/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 17, 2011 SUBJECT: Bella Vista Apartment HDZ & SCZ Overlay- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 1900 W Speedway Blvd, T15S R13E Sec3/10 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T11SA00336 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed overlay package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the overlay package at this time. The following items need to be addressed: HDZ OVERLAY COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.9-01.2.3: The following information is to be provided on the overlay sheets for all projects affected by the Hillside Development Zone review: a) Completed. b) Topographic information of the existing terrain, prior to any grading, grubbing, clearing, excavation, or modification, with contour intervals as specified in Development Standard 9-01.0. The overlay package should include a separate sheet that shows all topographical information of the property and it should not include any of the proposed improvements per the referenced standard. Do not show the buildings, PAAL, sidewalk, refuse container, etc. c) Completed. d) The following slope analysis information must be provided on the plan. For specific information on calculations of slope, refer to Development Standard 9-01.0. I. The average natural cross slope (ACS) must be listed in the general notes on the plat or plan. It is shown on the HDZ Sheet, but it also needs to be included either on Sheet 1 or 2 of the package within the General Notes. II. If the development criteria of Sec. 2.8.1.6 of the LUC require an analysis of sloped areas, those areas of fifteen (15) percent or greater slope must be shown on a topographic map. The overlay package should include a separate sheet that shows all topographical information of the property and it should not include any of the proposed improvements per the referenced standard. 2) DS Sec.9-01.4.1: The Average Natural Cross Slope (ACS) of a site is determined in the following manner. The site is depicted on a topographic map of the existing terrain, prior to any grading, grubbing, clearing, excavation, or modification, utilizing a scale no smaller than one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) feet, with the following contour interval. The HDZ Sheet that shows the ACS should not contain the proposed improvements in order to calculate the slope analysis and show areas of 15% or greater. 3) Completed. SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY COMMENTS: 4) Completed. 5) Completed. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Overlay Package submittal that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. The architect letter referred to Hilgart Wilson responses however the only responses from Hilgart Wilson addressed Zoning comments and not Engineering comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Overlay Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 11/21/2011 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 21, 2011 Philip Carhuff, AIA Krebs Carhuff Architects 3149 East Prince Road #151 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: T11SA00336 Hillside Development and Scenic Corridor Overlay Zones for 1900 West Speedway Blvd (D11-0026) Dear Phil: Your submittal of October 27, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Overlay Zone submittal package as detailed in the on line comments (Engineering, DSD). Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 577-4599 |