Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T11OT00350
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/25/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please show location of existing fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. Refer to C.O.T. amendments to 2006 IFC (section 503) for spacing requirements. An additional hydrant may be necessary. Indicate if fire sprinklers are, in fact, going to be installed. |
| 03/03/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET C1 1. Please change note 3 to reference the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition) for all governing accessibility codes and Sections 405 and 406 for all curb and sidewalk ramps. a. SD 207 is for COT DOT public right of way accessible requirements only. 2. Provide a large scale detail of each different type of curb or sidewalk ramps. Please show all dimensions, slopes, detectable warnings strips and marked crossings as per Section 406.12 and 406.14. 3. Please provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking spaces showing all dimensions, markings, symbols, sign locations, aisles, access to the accessible route and grade slope requirements. 4. Please identify the accessible routes intended for the site and show slope compliance as per Section 403.3. SHEET C2 5. None of the ramp details shown here are relative to this project. Please delete and provide large the scale details as per comment 2. SHEET C3 6. Please add a "Van Accessible" sign to the signage detail 9/A-C3. END OF COMMENTS |
| 03/07/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1.The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 2. Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior NPP Landscape approval stamp. 3. All plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 2-16.0. Citrus sinensis is not on the aforementioned list. 4. An oasis is an area where non-drought tolerant landscaping designs are permitted. 5. Plants not listed on the Drought Tolerant Plant List may be used in an oasis if the plants are grouped in separately programmed irrigation areas according to their water requirements. 6. Submit a revised irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 7. Additional comments may apply upon subsequent revisions. |
| 03/09/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/09/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T11OT00350 3422 E Glenn Rd. Parking Plan For existing Development TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 9, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Label the proposed angle of the angled parking spaces along the south side of the development. Ensure that the parking space dimensions and PAAL width complies with the LUC requirements for the specific angled parking space. Revise any dimensions if necessary. 2. All parking spaces that abut sidewalks must be designed with wheel stops 2.5 feet from the front of the parking spaces. If the sidewalks are widened to six and one-half feet wheel stops will not be required. 3. The radius at the two landscape planters may have to be redesigned to allow for the refuse truck to maneuver around the PAAL area which is between the two central buildings and the buildings along the south. See Engineering or environmental services comments. 4. Provide a five pedestrian refuge area with a minimum four-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the south side of the southern building. Also include a minimum four-foot wide sidewalk connecting the sidewalk system along the north side of the southern building and the required sidewalk along the southern building. If needed, include a access ramp at the connection. 5. Provide a six-foot wide sidewalk along the street frontage as was approved by the last approved plan and plan. Provide access ramps at the PAAL crossings. See ADA comments. 6. Revise the parking calculations to state that 49 spaces are provided. If the radius at the landscape islands as mentioned in comment 3 is required a potential loss of two parking spaces is possible. While a two vehicle parking space loss is due to two additional spaces provided, three spaces lost would require some redesign of the parking lot to add additional parking space. 7. Address all comments and revise the site plan as required demonstrating compliance. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T11OT00350sp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan |
| 03/10/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | March 10, 2011 T10OT00350 1. The PAAL north of Lots 374 -377 and 386-389 is labeled as one way. The width is sufficient for two way travel and the parking spaces are not angled so the PAAL should be 2-way. 2. The solid waste container location appears to be accessible. Please show the turning radii on the site plan to confirm the accessibility. Loren Makus, EIT loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4927 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/11/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |