Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 1ST
Permit Number - T11CM03933
Review Name: REVISION - - 1ST
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
03/02/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
03/08/2012 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. LETTER OF REVISIONS; STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING REVISION 1: PROVIDE A CALCULATION FOR THE NEW FOOTING ALONG GRID 2 BETWEEN GRIDS E AND F. IT APPEARS A NEW COLUMN HAS ALSO BEEN ADDED ON GRID 2. 2. LETTER OF REVISIONS; STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING REVISION 2: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE NEW FOOTINGS NEAR GRIDS 5.3 AND B AND GRIDS 5.4 AND A. 3. LETTER OF REVISIONS; STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING REVISION 3: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE NEW DECORATIVE COLUMN FOOTINGS NEAR GRIDS 5.4 AND E AND GRIDS 5.6 AND E. 4. SHEETS S1.0, S1.1, AND S1.2: DELTA 3 IS NOTED IN THE REVISIONS, BUT NOTHING IS CLOUDED. CLARIFY. 5. SHEET S1.4: INDICATE DELTA 3 IN THE REVISIONS. THE FOOTING SCHEDULE MARK F4 SHOULD BE CLOUDED. 6. SHEETS S2.0 AND S2.1: DELTA 3 INDICATES THE ENTIRE SHEET HAS BEEN REVISED. SPECIFICALLY CLOUD THE CHANGED ITEMS. 7. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 121: DETAIL 121 COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON THE PLANS. SHOULD THIS DETAIL BE REFERENCED IN THE LINTEL SCHEDULE? CLARIFY. 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
03/14/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
03/14/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
03/21/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
03/21/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |