Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM03895
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/17/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/17/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/27/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration, states that a notation shall be placed beneath the seal, either written, typed, or electronically generated, that provides the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration. (Effective March 8, 2008). [Original comment: Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.] 2. Comment not addressed. Key notes 7, 8, 9, and 10 on sheet M100 call for the grease exhaust ducts "to be encased in fire-rated enclosure". Provide a design for the fire- rated enclosure. Reference: Section 506.3.10, IMC 2006. 3. Comment not addressed. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006 (i.e. the load includes the possible weight of people working on the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 4. Comment not addressed. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. |
| 02/27/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration, states that a notation shall be placed beneath the seal, either written, typed, or electronically generated, that provides the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration. (Effective March 8, 2008). [Original comment: Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.] 2. Comment not resolved; civil plans added to the drawing index on sheet G001 but not included in the drawing set. [Original comment: Provide the referenced civil site drawing that shows the size, route, cleanout locations, and the slope of the building sewer along with the specified gravity grease interceptor. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.] 3. Comment not resolved; sheet P300 still shows 2" cleanouts for 3" drains. [Original comment: Provide cleanouts sized per Section 708.7, IPC 2006 (e.g. a 3" drain requires a 3" cleanout).] 4. Comment not resolved; coordinate detail 01/P101 with the layout for the 3-compartment sink as shown on sheet K2. [Original comment: Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink (see Detail 01/P101), with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Section 802.1, IPC 2006.] |
| 02/27/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved; civil plans added to the drawing index on sheet G001 but not included in the drawing set. [Original comment: Provide the civil site plan referenced on sheet P200 to show the location of the water meter and the continuation of the water service line to the building. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.] 2. Comment not resolved; the reduced pressure backflow assembly is still shown inside of the building and not accessible to Tucson Water. [Original comment: Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies for the building water service are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf] |
| 03/07/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Buffalo Wild Wings @ Wetmore Plaza T11CM03895 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 7, 2012 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the Development Package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 03/15/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/23/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |