Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM03892
Parcel: 12709016A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T11CM03892
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/03/2012 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1.Please provide complete fault current analysis.
2.Provide IECC calc's.
3.Note for ground (gec} for SES "EUSRC" plan sheet E1 one line refers to diagram 4/E4? Please clarify.
4. Detail 4 on plan sheet E2 shows a symbol #n. Not shown anywhere else ? Provide grounding and bonding conductor sizes as per 250 nec.
5.Please indicate what is new and what is exsisting on one diagrams and panel schedules.
01/06/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
01/06/2012 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SHEET A1.0
1. How do all the parking changes shown around the building effect the overall parking situation? Please submit a modified site plan showing all changes noted on the floor plans and the new parking layout design.
SHEET A1.0, A1.1 AND A1.2
2. Please provide large scale details of all the different accessible parking layouts. Please show all required accessible dimensions, slopes, ramps, signage, "Van Accessible" space and accessible routes.
3. Provide large scale details of all different types of ramps showing all required accessible dimensions, slopes, flared sides as required, marked crossings and detectable warning strips at all marked crossings.
4. Please indicate slope compliance on the drawings of all accessible routes in compliance with ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3.
5. Provide at least one accessible pedestrian route to the public right of way.
6. Detectable warnings are required at both ends of a marked crossing only. Please delete all those shown that are not part of a marked crossing.
7. Please provide the proper quantity of accessible parking spaces as per Table 1106.1.
SHEET S1.0
8. Please provide a written summary of all deferred submittals to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose, for assessment of additional review fees.
SHEET SA1- BUILDING 101
9. Door 14 does not have the required accessible clearances on both sides of the door as required by ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 404.2.3.1.
SHEET SA6
10. Large Scale Toilet plan, please provide all required accessible dimensions, clearances, accessories and fixtures.
11. Details 1 and 2: Please show all required accessible dimensions, clearances and accessories on the actual designed toilet elevations as per ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 edition.
SHEET SA7
12. ADA Requirements: The governing accessibility requirements are as per the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition. Please correct the title and requirements on all details to this accessible code: i.e. vertical grab bar and dimensions.
SHEET S2.1
13. LT4 schedule references detail 316. The size is somewhat ambiguous, please clarify.
END OF REVIEW
01/09/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain or gutter unless the roof drain or gutter terminates at or above grade in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
01/09/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the plumbing code to be used for this activity; the City of Odessa, Texas Plumbing Code is not applicable. This review has been made using the 2006 UPC with City of Tucson amendments.
2. Revise keynote #7 on sheet SP-1 to depict the actual conditions. According to the information on sheet P1.0, the "existing" gas piping referenced by keynote #7 on the roof is being installed as part of this activity.
3. Provide the sizing data (e.g. vent material, total vent height, and offsets) for the flue for the gas-fired unit heater. Reference: Section 511.0, UPC 2006.
4. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
5. Limit the water velocity in the copper piping to less than 8 fps for cold water and 5 fps for the hot water. Reference: Section 610.12, UPC 2006.
6. The branch piping sizes called out for the flush valves will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Sections 610.12 and A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6.
7. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006.
8. Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006 (e.g. the 4" drain located downstream of the east water closet in the women's restroom requires a 4" cleanout).
9. Verify that the horizontal length of the 1-1/2" vent piping from the janitor's sink does not exceed twenty feet. Reference: Section 904.2, UPC 2006.
10. Provide the civil site drawing referenced on sheet P1.0 that shows the continuation and termination of the new 8" rainwater leader. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
11. Provide a cleanout at the base of the new 8" roof drain leader prior to its connection with the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Section 1101.12.2, UPC 2006.
01/10/2012 GBONILL1 WWM REVIEW Denied 1. TENANT "A" EAST SUITE ONLY - FUTURE STEINMART - FORMERLY PORTION OF MERVY'S - RECOUNTED ALL WASTEWATER PLUMBING FIXTURES - NEED WASTEWATER 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION FOR REMOVAL OF 1 HAND SINK & 1-2" FS PER DEMO DRAWING D1 DATED 12/16/11
2. NEED TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER.
12/23/2011 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire alarm system required. Refer to 2006 IFC, section 907.2.7
12/23/2011 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 23, 2011
REVIEWER: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T11CM03892 (Building Plan)

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received the building plan (T11CM03892). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the building plan applications at this time. The following items need to be addressed:


BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS:

1) Engineering could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with a stamped approved Development Plan Package for the proposed expansion. Please submit a copy of the stamped approved Development Plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

2) Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped Development Plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide the building plan with a copy of the last approved Development Plan. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the building plan review.

For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929.
12/28/2011 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Approved