Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM03849
Parcel: 12510003G

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T11CM03849
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/06/2012 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
01/06/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
2. Provide a cleanout at the junction of the building drain and the building sewer. Reference: Sections 719.1 and 719.2, UPC 2006.
01/06/2012 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
01/06/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
01/06/2012 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A4.0; DETAIL 9: KEYNOTE 2 AND THE DETAIL INDICATE THE EDGE OF THE TURNDOWN SLAB (AND FACE OF FOUNDATION) IS 3-1/2" OFF THE GRID LINE. VERIFY THIS CONDITION IS INDICATED ON THE PLANS ON A1.0.
2. SHEET A4.1; DETAIL 12: PROVIDE A NOTE ON THIS DETAIL SIMILAR TO ROOF FRAMING KEYNOTE 5 ON SHEET S2.1.
3. SHEET S1.1; FOUNDATIONS: NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOILS REPORT WAS USED IN THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW.
4. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 5 SHOULD BE MOVED TO THE MASONRY WALL. VERIFY.
5. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 4 SHOULD BE ADDED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
6. SHEET S3.1; DETAIL 105: THE TOEDOWN DOES NOT EXTEND THE 1'-6" MINIMUM PER FOUNDATION NOTE 1 ON S1.1. CLARIFY.
7. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: WILL THE TOP OF THE COLUMN FOOTINGS ON THE EAST WALL DROP 6" IF THE SLAB TOEDOWN (DETAIL 105/S3.1) EXTENDS 1'-6" BELOW GRADE? VERIFY.
8. SHEET S3.1; DETAIL 104: PROVIDE A NOTE ON THIS DETAIL FOR THE TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATION.
9. SHEET S4.1: PROVIDE REFERENCES TO THE ARCHITECTURAL FOR TOP OF CMU WALLS (DETAILS 201, 202, 203, AND 207).
10. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV.
11. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
01/06/2012 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Provide the referenced utility plan to show the location of the new water meter and reduced pressure zone backflow prevention assembly.
01/06/2012 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch (all upper case). Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
2. Revise the energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope, using the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet (the town of Pima is located in Graham County). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/17/2012 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed