Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T11CM03786
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2012 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/13/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/19/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET G000; CODE SUMMARY (AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS): THE REFERENCE TO THE IBC SECTION 704.2.2 IS NOT PERTINENT TO AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET G000; CODE SUMMARY (AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS): SPRINKLERS ARE NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE THIS IS AN EXISTING BUILDING AND NO NEW R OCCUPANCY AREAS ARE BEING ADDED. 3. SHEET G101; OCCUPANT LOAD: PROVIDE AN OCCUPANT LOAD ON THE DRAWINGS WITH A BREAKDOWN OF THE SEPARATE OCCUPANCY TYPES. 4. SHEET A110; FIRST FLOOR PLAN: A SECTION CUT THROUGH THE FRONT DESK INDICATES 1/A602. SHEET A602 IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SET. CLARIFY. 5. SHEET A201; SECOND FLOOR PLAN: A DETAIL CUT ON GRID B INDICATES 2/A112 (ROOF DRAIN DETAIL). REVISE. 6. SHEET A201 (SECOND FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A601 (DETAIL 12): THE NEW WALL IS CMU PER KEYNOTE 2 ON SHEET A110. IT DOES NOT APPEAR DETAIL 12 INDCATES ANY CMU. CLARIFY. 7. SHEET S002; GENERAL NOTES: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE. 8. SHEET S201 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S501 (DETAIL 6): IS THE DETAIL 6/S501 CUT ON GRID A.2 (DOUBLE CMU FOUNDATION WALL) CORRECT? VERIFY. 9. SHEET S202 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S501 (DETAIL 5): IS THE DETAIL 5/S501 CUT ON GRID 5 CORRECT, OR SHOULD THIS DETAIL BE CUT ON THE EXERCISE ROOM PLAN? VERIFY. 10. SHEEET S401; BASE PLATE DETAILS: INCLUDE BP7 IN THE DETAILS. 11. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/21/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. |
| 12/21/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the size of the roof drain, overflow roof drain, and the vertical rainwater piping. Reference: Section 1101.11, UPC 2006. |
| 12/21/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/21/2011 | RSHERRY1 | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | No new plumbing fixtures. |
| 12/28/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1050 E. 8th Street T11CM03786 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 28, 2011 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |