Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM03738
Parcel: 11711102A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T11CM03738
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/05/2012 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1. REILLY CRAFT PIZZA - 1ST (58FU'S) & 2ND FLOOR (26FU'S) - NO WASTEWATER PLUMBING FIXTURES IN BASEMENT STORAGE AREA
2. NEED WW/WC/TOM TOMCHAK REVIEW OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR 724-6200 - 3035 W EL CAMINO DEL CERRO
3. NEED TO SHOW EXISTING LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - NEED PCRWRD/CHAD AMATEAU REVIEW - 740-6547
4. NEED CAPCITY EVALUATION- PCRWRD- 3RD FLOOR/ KURT STEMM -740-6607
5. RECOUNTED ALL WASTEWATER PLUMBING FIXTURES - NEED WASTEWATER CREDIT EVALUATION 5TH FLOOR - 740-6602 OR 740-6606
12/09/2011 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved Regarding sprinkler design criteria on sheet P2.1. Storage areas (basement?) must be designed to a density of 0.20/1500 sq. ft.- Ordinary Group II
12/13/2011 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied A site plan meeting the requirements of DS 2-01 will be required prior to building plan approval. Per Zonings notice A DRB review and a Historic Reivew will be required prior to approval of these building plans. Provide a site plan for review and approval on the next submittal.

Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meeting call me at 837-4929.

Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
12/15/2011 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A0.2; CODE SUMMARY: UNDER "SEPARATED USES PROVIDED", REVISE THE R-2 NOTATION.
2. SHEET A0.2; CODE SUMMARY: THE "PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT" INDICATES 117 OCCUPANTS, BUT DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE 179 OCCUPANTS TOTAL LISTED IN THE "OCCUPANT LOAD". CLARIFY AND REVISE.
3. SHEET A0.2; CODE SUMMARY: UNDER "OCCUPANCY", LIST THE R-2 PORTION.
4. SHEET A0.2; CODE SUMMARY: UNDER "OCCUPANT LOAD", LIST THE R-2 PORTION.
5. SHEET A0.2; BUILDING SECTION FIRE SEPARATION: IT DOES NOT APPEAR THE PERIMETER WALL REQUIRES A 2 HOUR FIRE RATING. VERIFY.
6. SHEET A0.2; FIRST FLOOR EXIT PLAN: THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE PATIO INDICATED ON THE EXIT PLAN DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE LOAD INDICATED IN THE CODE SUMMARY. CLARIFY.
7. SHEETS A1.0 AND A2.3; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 05 52 01 INDICATES A NEW 40" HIGH STEEL GUARD RAIL. REVISE THE HEIGHT TO MEET IBC SECTION 1013.2 REQUIREMENTS.
8. SHEET A2.3; FIRST FLOOR REFERENCE PLAN: INDICATE THE SEATING ARRANGEMENT IN THE DINING, BAR, AND PATIO AREAS. INDICATE THE ACCESSIBLE SEATING AND STANDING SPACES PER THE IBC SECTION 1108.2.8.1 REQUIREMENTS.
9. SHEET A3.0; PLAN: PLAN TITLE SHOULD BE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN. REVISE.
10. SHEET A8.0; ELEVATIONS 5 THROUGH 12: ARE THE GRAB BARS IN THE RESTROOMS EXISTING? IF NOT, PROVIDE DIMENSIONED ELEVATIONS PER ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, CHAPTER 6 REQUIREMENTS.
11. GENERAL: PROVIDE A SECOND FLOOR PLAN IN THE DRAWINGS.
12. SHEET S2.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: KEYNOTE 1 IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN. PROVIDE.
13. SHEET S3.1; FIRST FLOOR PLAN: KEYNOTE 26 IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN. PROVIDE.
14. SHEET S4.1; FLOOR PLAN: KEYNOTE 45 INDICATES A NEW LINTEL. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THIS LINTEL ON THE DRAWINGS.
15. SHEET S4.1: PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE PLANS WHERE THE NEW METAL ROOF DECK ABUTS THE EXISTING NORTH WALL.
16. SHEET S6.1; DETAIL 103: REVISE NOTES 1 AND 2 (8" DIMENSION).
17. SHEET S6.1; DETAIL 103: REVISE NOTE 3 (1-#4 CONTINUOUS?).
18. SHEET S6.1; DETAIL 103: REVISE NOTE 7 AND ADD NOTE 8.
19. SHEET S6.2: TWO DETAILS ARE NUMBERED 204. REVISE.
20. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 7: WHERE ARE THE ROOF JOISTS (2X10 AT 24" O.C.) LOCATED ON THE PLAN? CLARIFY.
21. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
12/19/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
12/20/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 301.2, IPC 2006.
2. Appliances (e.g. soda dispensers, ice makers, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2006.
3. Coordinate the proposed location of the gravity grease interceptor with the proposed location of the trash dumpster and its surrounding bollards. Show that adequate maintenance access is provided for the interceptor. Reference: Section 1003.10, IPC 2006.
4. Verify the total connected gas load for the mechanical units on the roof; the total load is shown as 550 CFH but the total of the individual loads is 540 CFH. (Note also that the mechanical equipment schedule on sheet M2.0 specifies a maximum natural gas input of 72 CFH for each of the three future rooftop units.) Reference: Section 106.3.1, IFGC 2006.
5. Provide the basis for the design of the gas service piping for the future second floor appliances (e.g. connected load and developed length of pipe). Reference: Section 106.3.1, IFGC 2006.
12/20/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify keynotes 32 and 33, sheet M1.0. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
2. Show that the installation of the make-up air diffusers does not conflict with the installation requirements of the Type I hood with regard to high velocity air impinging on the face of the hood. Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2006.
3. Provide manufacturer's equipment data and listing information along with the unit weight, mechanical, and electrical operating information for the pizza oven. Reference: Section 301.6, IMC 2006.
4. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
12/21/2011 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approv-Cond 1) Provide elevation information for BB and BBE lights under canopy. Purpose is to verify that lights are shielded per the Outdoor Lighting Code [no candela above 90 degrees above the nadir]
12/27/2011 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 101 E. Pennington Street
T11CM03738
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 28, 2011

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. As an expansion of use is proposed, seating and walk-in cooler, provide a site plan that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-01.0.

3. Per LUC Section 2.8.10.4 Development Review Board (DRB) review is required prior to approval of the site and building plans. Contact Russlyn Wells @837-4948 for DRB review requirements.

4. Historic review is required for this project prior to approval of the site and building plans. Contact Frank Podgorski @837-4962 for historic review requirements.

5. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/11/2012 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/11/2012 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed