Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM03640
Parcel: 11205030B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T11CM03640
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/01/2011 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied This comments apply to the job as a whole and will be repeated for all activity numbers.
1) Fire Department approved lock boxes will be required at
sliding gates.
2) Fire sprinklers will need to be installed in building A. Reference 2006 IFC, section 903.2.7.
3) An alarm system will be required in all residential buildings
except those containing fire sprinklers. Reference 2006
IFC, section 907.3.6.
4) Please provide clarification regarding separation between
Building A and Leasing building. Are they connected by
a roof structure? Do they require fire wall separation?
12/05/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the plumbing code to be used for this activity. The plumbing General Notes on sheet P3.1 refer to the 2006 UPC but the Code analysis on sheet T1.1 refers to the 2006 IPC. This review has been made using the 2006 UPC.
2. Indicate the materials to be used in the proposed plumbing systems for this activity. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 301.1, 604.0, 701.0, 903.0, 1102.0, and 1209.5, UPC 2006. Clarify which new water piping is to be PEX.
3. Correct the equipment tag for the showers in waste and vent isometric 3/P2.1 to coordinate with the plumbing floor plan. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
5. The laundry closets appear to be designed to accommodate a stacked washer/dryer; verify that the standpipe waste receptors for the clothes washers will be readily accessible for inspection and cleaning when the stacked washer/dryers are in place. Reference: Section 804.1, UPC 2006.
12/05/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Show that the door to the laundry closet has a minimum makeup air opening of 100-square inches. Reference: Section 504.5, IMC 2006.
12/05/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Passed
12/15/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
12/16/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied GENERAL
1. Several sheets through out this submittal have lettering smaller than the COT standard for all document submittals of 3/32" minimum for all lower and upper case. Please revise all sheets that are non-compliant and resubmit.
2. The line weight of existing building elements to remain is too light. Please make the lines darker and resubmit.
3. The scope of work needs to be more clearly defined:
a. Please provide 1st and 2nd floor plans of all of the existing apartment buildings showing clearly those building elements to remain and those building elements to be demolished. Show all 1st floor walkways and stairways. Show all balconies and stairways.
b. Please provide 1st and 2nd floor plans of all of the modified apartment buildings showing clearly the existing building elements and the new building elements. Show all 1st floor walkways and stairways. Show all balconies and stairways.
4. Provide construction details and large scale elevations for new balcony railings. Show complinace with the 2006 IBC, Sections 1013 and 1606.7.1.
5. Provide structural calculations for all roof top mounted HVAC equipment.
6. Provide full framing plans and details for all new clerestory roof framing.
7. Provide elevations for all new toilet room and new kitchen plans.
END OF REVIEW
12/23/2011 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 12/23/2011

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
12/28/2011 KEN VAN KARSEN ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/09/2012 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed