Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM03634
Parcel: 11205030B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T11CM03634
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/01/2011 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied This comments apply to the job as a whole and will be repeated for all activity numbers.
1) Fire Department approved lock boxes will be required at
sliding gates.
2) Fire sprinklers will need to be installed in building A. Reference 2006 IFC, section 903.2.7.
3) An alarm system will be required in all residential buildings
except those containing fire sprinklers. Reference 2006
IFC, section 907.3.6.
4) Please provide clarification regarding separation between
Building A and Leasing building. Are they connected by
a roof structure? Do they require fire wall separation?
12/05/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Passed
12/05/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4, 101.4.3, and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on new ducts in this project. Reference: Section 403.2.1, IECC 2006.
3. Show how the horizontal fan coils are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
4. Show that the doors to the laundry closets each have minimum makeup air openings of 100-square inches. Reference: Section 504.5, IMC 2006.
5. Clarify why the den in floor plan 2C (labeled as X in the mechanical sheets) does not have any supply air. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 401.2, IMC 2006.
12/06/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the plumbing code to be used for this activity. The plumbing General Notes on sheet P3.1 refer to the 2006 UPC but the Code analysis on sheet T1.1 refers to the 2006 IPC. This review has been made using the 2006 UPC.
2. Indicate the materials to be used in the proposed plumbing systems for this activity. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 301.1, 604.0, 701.0, 903.0, 1102.0, and 1209.5, UPC 2006. Clarify which new water piping is to be PEX.
3. Correct the equipment tag for the showers in waste and vent isometric 3/P2.1 to coordinate with the plumbing floor plan. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
5. In floor plan 2C (labeled as three bedroom floor plan in the plumbing sheets and as floor plan "3" on P0.1), provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes on the first floor that exceed 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. (Note: the
6. The laundry closets appear to be designed to accommodate a stacked washer/dryer; verify that the standpipe waste receptors for the clothes washers will be readily accessible for inspection and cleaning when the stacked washer/dryers are in place. Reference: Section 804.1, UPC 2006.
12/13/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
12/14/2011 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: architectural design group, inc.DATE: December 29, '11
2510 E. Grant Rd., ste. 140 Tucson, Arizona 85716

Subject: Casa Presidio Apartments, 2002 E. Fort Lowell Rd.
Site plan DP11-0015 (First Review)
T13S, R14E, Section 32

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package and Drainage Statement.

The Development Package (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. The fut. FOC location for a 100' MS and R is 11' from the fut. R/W line. All SVT's begin at the face of curb with the stem side of the SVT is drawn toward the property, not the street. The SVT dimensions for a local st. to an arterial (Ft. Lowell Rd.): NS = 20'x 340', FS = 20'x 125'. The SVT dimensions for a Drive/PAAL to a Local St. (Olson and Wilson Aves.): NS = 20'x 185', FS = 20'x 110'.
4. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. Any const. in the FEMA regulated flood plain requires a Flood Plain Use Permit (FUP). Separate FUP's will be required for Bldg. "A" and Bldg. "B". The FUP for the proposed patio wall in the flood plain will be attached to Bldg. "B's" FUP. Submit 2 sets of the site plan, drainage statement along with the FUP application for both buildings.
5. Construction cost estimates are required or shall be included for any improvements to any structures that are attached to Bldg. "A". This includes Bldg. J, Bldg. L and the associated improvements.
6. The construction cost of the improvements shall not exceed 50% of the total appraised/assessed value of the existing structure, not including the land. An appraisal for each bldg. separate from the cost of the land that is located in the FEMA regulated floodplain shall be included with the cost est.
7. Provide a note on the plans indicating that any future construction (covered parking) in the flood plain shall require separate FUP's.
8. List the total disturbed area in sq. feet on the plans.
9. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
10. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. List on the plans if both are "0".
11. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
12. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
13. Provide City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
14. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. Any const. in the FEMA regulated flood plain requires a FUP. See comment no. 4. Walls constructed in flood plain shall be built with engineered drainage openings.
15. Show Development plan (DP11-0015) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
16. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Call out that any new construction done to the existing refuse enclosures shall be per COT Development Standard 6-01.0.
17. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
18. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
19. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers and/or sidewalk scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof drain/sidewalk scupper locations have been designed and located and that the 10-year flow must be conveyed under any other sidewalks and/or pedestrian paths will suffice.
20. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
21. A floodplain use permit is required.
22. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
23. "A grading permit may be required for this project depending on the earthwork quantities listed plan. See note no. 10. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans".
24. If you would like to discuss the comments prior to the re-submittal of the DP, a meeting can be scheduled to do so. The contact information is listed below.

Drainage Statement:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS.
2. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation in the DS.
3. The construction cost of the improvements shall not exceed 50% of the total appraised/assessed value of the existing structure, not including the land. An appraisal for each bldg. separate from the cost of the land that is located in the FEMA regulated floodplain shall be included with the cost est.
4. Any const. in the FEMA regulated flood plain requires a Flood Plain Use Permit (FUP). Separate FUP's will be required for Bldg. "A" and Bldg. "B". The proposed patio wall in the flood plain will be attached to Bldg. "B's" FUP. Submit 2 sets of the site plan, drainage statement along with the FUP application for both buildings.
5. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted with the re-submittal of the DP.
6. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2.
7. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/ 2002 E. Fort Lowell Rd. Site-DP
12/15/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied GENERAL
1. Several sheets through out this submittal have lettering smaller than the COT standard for all document submittals of 3/32" minimum for all lower and upper case. Please revise all sheets that are non-compliant and resubmit.
2. The line weight of existing building elements to remain is too light. Please make the lines darker and resubmit.
3. Please provide a letter of deferred submittals to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose.
4. The scope of work needs to be more clearly defined:
a. Please provide 1st and 2nd floor plans of all of the existing apartment buildings showing clearly those building elements to remain and those building elements to be demolished. Show all 1st floor walkways and stairways. Show all balconies and stairways.
b. Please provide 1st and 2nd floor plans of all of the modified apartment buildings showing clearly the existing building elements and the new building elements. Show all 1st floor walkways and stairways. Show all balconies and stairways.
5. On sheet SP-1, the legend and site plan indicate that all apartment buildings except buildings "A' and "C" are getting new access balconies.
a. Why not buildings "A" and "C" also?
b. Please provide a poche' symbol for these two building access balconies in the Legend and a definition of what is to be done here.
6. Sheet S3.1: The roof beam span scales +/- 20'-0" at the 2C Roof Framing Plan. The calculations show this beam sized for 17'-0" span. Please reconcile.
7. Sheet S2.0: Ditto comment 6 for floor beam.
8. Sheet S2.0: 2C Floor Framing Plan, at the right side of the covered porch, detail reference 6/6.0 is not similar at all.
9. Sheet S1.1: Detail reference mark 6/S6.0 at the isolated footing is not correct.
10. Sheet S1.1: Detail 9/S5.0 shows 16" wide footing whereas the calcs call for 18" wide footing.
11. Sheet 3.2: Show connection of new shed roof from the new office building addition to the side of building "A".
a. Provide a 1 hour separation at this roof connection.
12. Provide a 1 hour separation between the existing building "A" and the new 2C apartment addition or provide sprinkler system for the whole building as per Fire comments.
a. You are indicating that there exists an 8" RCMU wall separating the new construction. This could be very easily be maintained as a 1 hour partition.
13. Provide construction details and large scale elevations for new and modified balcony railings. Show complinace with the 2006 IBC, Sections 1013 and 1606.7.1.
14. Provide structural calculations for all roof top mounted HVAC equipment.
15. At detail 1/SP1.1, 1/A1.1 and 1/A1.2, the most western unit of the existing building is poche'd as if it is to be new construction when it is in fact existing. Please reconcile.
16. Provide full roof framing plans and details for all new clerestory roof framing.
17. Provide elevations for all new toilet room and new kitchen plans.
END OF REVIEW
12/23/2011 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 12/23/2011

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
12/28/2011 KEN VAN KARSEN ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/09/2012 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed